FYI (so no one else does it)
I 've requested those both lists on gmane.org to be separated from the
dev list.
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Brett Porter wrote:
I have some bandwidth so I'm doing this a bit earlier today.
Going once, going twice
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
Since
I think that m1 commits don't pollute a lot of people ;-)
Our activity is very minor compared to the m2 one !
Arnaud
On 3/8/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > I have some bandwidth so I'm doing this a bit earlier today.
> >
> > Going once, going twice
>
Brett Porter wrote:
I have some bandwidth so I'm doing this a bit earlier today.
Going once, going twice
My only request is separate commit lists for separate code bases i.e.
separate lists for m1 and m2. It would be nice to have a clean list of
commits for a codebase using a simple mai
I have some bandwidth so I'm doing this a bit earlier today.
Going once, going twice
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
> Since we've voted to do this, I'm just going to give people 48 hours to
> object to these particular names.
>
> [see MPA-50]
>
> Our dev list traffic has gone nuts. Let's crea
+1 (non-binding)
--
Dennis Lundberg
Brett Porter wrote:
Since we've voted to do this, I'm just going to give people 48 hours to
object to these particular names.
[see MPA-50]
Our dev list traffic has gone nuts. Let's create:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* this will be for CI, error reports from the re
+1 (non-binding)
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Since we've voted to do this, I'm just going to give people 48
hours to
object to these particular names.
[see MPA-50]
Our dev list traffic has gone nuts. Let's create:
[EMAIL PROT
+1
On 3/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we've voted to do this, I'm just going to give people 48 hours to
> object to these particular names.
>
> [see MPA-50]
>
> Our dev list traffic has gone nuts. Let's create:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> * this will be for CI, error reports
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
Since we've voted to do this, I'm just going to give people 48 hours to
object to these particular names.
[see MPA-50]
Our dev list traffic has gone nuts. Let's create:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* this will be for CI, error reports from the repository manager, and so on
* depe
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
>> * for commits - we already have it (each subproject has its own)
>
> what do you mean by this? My first impression is that you mean
> the maven1, maven2 and continuum (and other subprojects) have their
> own commits list - if so, what are they called? I probably misunder
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Brett Porter wrote:
+1 for these names.
Btw, for completeness: we also have 'users@' and 'announce@' (right?).
Just one question:
> commits@maven.apache.org
>
> * for commits - we already have it (each subproject has its own)
what do you mean by this? My first impression is
10 matches
Mail list logo
