,
>
> Julien
>
>
>
> - Message d'origine
> > De : Raphael Ackermann
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Envoyé le : Lun 26 avril 2010, 13 h 05 min 49 s
> > Objet : Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
> >
> > Added it to my co
.ackerm...@gmail.com>
>>
> À : Maven Developers List <
> href="mailto:dev@maven.apache.org";>dev@maven.apache.org>
>>
> Envoyé le : Ven 23 avril 2010, 11 h 53 min 32 s
>> Objet : Re: [VOTE]
> Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
>>
>> I c
;> Envoyé le : Ven 23 avril 2010, 11 h 53 min 32 s
>> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
>>
>> I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my
> settings.xml
>> but get following warnings on maven3 and error with
> maven2:
>
> m
ril 2010, 11 h 53 min 32 s
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
>
> I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my
settings.xml
> but get following warnings on maven3 and error with
maven2:
maven
> 3
mvn install -DskipTests=true
[WARNING]
I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my
settings.xml but get following warnings on maven3 and error with
maven2:
maven 3
mvn install -DskipTests=true
[WARNING]
[WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective settings
[WARNING] Unrecognised tag: 'build' (
this can be done simply by adding a profile activated with ${basedir} property:
I just added instruction at the end of Wiki page [1]
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+and+site+plugin
Le jeudi 22 avril 2010, Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 20
+1
I downloaded the source tarball, checked the signature, and built from sources.
Used that to build a few projects.
I still have some niggles (the same as previous alphas), I just need to
articulate them into JIRA before it goes final...
On 20/04/2010, at 3:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
+1
works fine on my test-projects
2010/4/22 Igor Fedorenko
> +1
>
> Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few
> our internal projects I work on.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
> Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 39 issues:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.or
+1
Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few
our internal projects I work on.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
There are still a couple of issues
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> No.
> It's 3.x prerequisite.
It would be good if there was some mechanism so that the site
generation could be made to work with either m2 or m3. Perhaps by
activating different profiles dependant on the maven version -
something like:
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 19 avril 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&p
+1
-Lukas
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1
Staging repo:
http
+1 works well here.
On 4/19/10 1:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&st
+1
2010/4/19 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1
>
> Staging repo
+1
Working here.
It's nice to see maven getting closer to the 3.0\o/
/Paul
Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:50:28, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 089
>
> There are still a couple of issue
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/s
No.
It's 3.x prerequisite.
2010/4/20 Brett Porter :
>
> On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY :
>>> what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
>>
>> Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
>>
>>> Olivier, is there something cr
On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY :
>> what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
>
> Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
>
>> Olivier, is there something critical missing?
>
> No except some spare time :-)
Does that
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency
> of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on
> your side
You are right. After changing that the build went on flawlessly.
+1 (N
provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency
of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on
your side
On 20 April 2010 08:11, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3
> the release
Hi,
2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
> Olivier, is there something critical missing?
No except some spare time :-)
> Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite go
Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3
the release build on one of my projects and got the following error
message:
[ERROR] The project
com.tsystems.icto.tom:tom-icto-dependencies:0.2.22-SNAPSHOT
(C:\workspace\tom-icto-parent\tom-icto-dependencies\pom.
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
Olivier, is there something critical missing?
Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite good
to me.
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 20 avril 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> Ok thx.
> I agree that we have a good tests co
Ok thx.
I agree that we have a good tests coverage to be quiet to switch.
Is there something which could be integrated before 3.0 final ? I
remember I saw a twit from you several weeks ago about replacing the
dl/ul layer to use a non-jetty stuff.
Arnaud
On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Jason van Zyl
+1 works ok here.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Wee!
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We solved 39 issues:
>> >
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
On 20/04/2010, at 8:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>>
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "be
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
>>> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a sche
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
>> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
>>
>
> When there's a long enough pe
If Stuart finishes the work it will go in.
I have 100% confidence in the ITs and that we'll find anything before users do
as a result of switching the container. We have had very few problems with
flipping Nexus from Plexus to Guice and Stuart was able to fix those very
quickly. Stuart is like
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
>
When there's a long enough period where users don't report any serious issues
it will be 3.0.
+1
Thus we start only bug fixes releases ?
Guice won't be included in 3.0 ?
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
2010/4/19 Tamás Cservenák
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> benjamin.bentm..
+1
ma., 19.04.2010 kl. 19.50 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=
+1
Glad to see a movement to beta
Shane
+1
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Issu
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
-
+1
On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> +1
>
> Wee!
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 39 issues:
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
> >
> > There are still a couple of issues left
+1
Wee!
On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tr
37 matches
Mail list logo
