Hi. Just wanted to ping you because I remember we talked about
hardnuts for test runners (like surefire). I've been recently trying
to think of a way to shutdown the forked JVM cleanly on permgen/ OOM
conditions (and signal it back as such to the controlling process).
Seems to be quite hard
: dawid.we...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:33:20 +0100
Subject: Surefire and low memory conditions
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Hi. Just wanted to ping you because I remember we talked about
hardnuts for test runners (like surefire). I've been recently trying
to think of a way to shutdown
rechtliche
Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen
wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
From: dawid.we...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:33:20 +0100
Subject: Surefire and low memory conditions
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Hi. Just wanted to ping
leichten Manipulierbarkeit von
E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
From: dawid.we...@gmail.com javascript:;
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:33:20 +0100
Subject: Surefire and low memory conditions
To: dev@maven.apache.org javascript:;
Hi. Just wanted to ping you
It would be quite simple to have a thread in the forked process
simply pulsing a heartbeat back to the plugin ?
And if 3 heartbeats are missed, we simply kill it ? (Pardon the pun ;)
Kristian
2013/1/2 Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com:
Hi. Just wanted to ping you because I remember we talked
It would be quite simple to have a thread in the forked process
simply pulsing a heartbeat back to the plugin ?
And if 3 heartbeats are missed, we simply kill it ? (Pardon the pun ;)
Yeah, I sort of have that already but not in a background thread form
(it's a longer story). Anyway, a
