Re: Surefire next release

Hi, For what it's worth, I would really like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1935 / https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/389 merged. It adds support for the SessionLauncher API in JUnit 5. We rely heavily on this API to prevent expensive components being recreated fo

Re: Surefire next release

+1 for 3.0.0, +1 to drop the roadmap page or keep it an internal page +1 for java 8 requirement in the doc (and in code if needed but this is not required) >From what I reviewed no PR merge is strictly needed to do a 3.0.0 so we can go as soon as we have a release manager with enough karma IMHO.

Re: Surefire next release

Il giorno mar 21 dic 2021 alle ore 13:49 Slawomir Jaranowski < s.jaranow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > > Summary for today. > > Decisions waiting to take: > > 1. What version do we want to release 3.0.0 or the next milestone? > 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 (this should be > 3.0.0Mxx) is good for me > 2.

Re: Surefire next release

Hi, Summary for today. Decisions waiting to take: 1. What version do we want to release 3.0.0 or the next milestone? 2. What with the road map on the first page ...? 3. JDK 8 as target - without refactor - will it be acceptable? - cause to stop upgrading some dependencies like commons-io 4. Fina

Re: Surefire next release

In my opinion onmy M9 would be worth it but I don't think users care too so we should go with 3.0.0, do other Mx in 3.0.x and if we want to tackle M9 items do a 3.1.0 (but not sure it bothers that much to be honest, it is more about being "clean" than anything else IMHO). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmann

Re: Surefire next release

And what with the road map ... https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:32 Slawomir Jaranowski napisał(a): > For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and > dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it

Re: Surefire next release

For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it works with earlier versions anyway - minimal Maven on jenkins is 3.2.5 JDK 8 - also only target change - will open possibility to refactor in the feature But we needed

Re: Surefire next release

Don't think both are important to release, we can mention we only target j8 without doing the change I think, this one is more than ok now. About JSR330 I think we are better staying away from it due to the related threads but it is internals anyway so not a big deal for surefire IMHO. Releasing t

Re: Surefire next release

What do you think about: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 - even 3.2.5 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1955 ... yes i know not all like it, but when ... if we think about 3.0.0 version it be ok i think before release ... niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:02 Romain Manni-

Re: Surefire next release

AFAIK there was no real change since "Cutting a release for Surefire?" from april where work was not production ready. That said I'm happy to get a 3.0.0 and maybe a 3.1.0 later since we abandonned 2 officially and 3 looks quite stable enough. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: Surefire next release

At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone versions in our builds. What is preventing the next version from being "3.0.0", no "M". I thought I read here a while back that the code was production ready. Gary On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy wrote: > Sounds good. > I'd really

Re: Surefire next release

Sounds good. I'd really like to review/include this PR as well https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 I hope to finish the review for this one during the week. On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 18:22, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi > > Last time I did the surefire build more stable. > > Now bui