Carlos Sanchez wrote:
you guys realize that final versions of Maven have been using Doxia
for quite some time now and the fact that it's being called alpha as
an excuse to make more API changes, which will affect the future
development of maven, instead of evolving the API in a backwards
I like your comments but let me argue a bit ;)
- what is what makes something stable ? dramatic API changes can go
in 2.0, 3.0,... they don't need to go before 1.0 (if not there would
never be any 1.0 final in any project)
- if something has been out for months/years and did not change
Lukas has continued work on trunk for beta-1 which includes changes to
the api. These changes will *not* be in the doxia release that I plan do
shortly. This release, dubbed alpha-10, is a bug-fix release for
alpha-9. Alpha-9 has some bugs that makes it unusable for the site- and
I agree on getting the release out, but we can't just go around the
underlying issue every time. For me the fact that it's being used in
several places for long time should make it stable, for coherence with
other projects using doxia.
On 10/21/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
