On 7 Jun 07, at 4:28 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey wrote:
Sorry, I'm not really following.
I understand that this is about integration-testing for Maven itself
That's all I was making clear.
-john
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jun 07, at 3:00 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey w
Sorry, I'm not really following.
I understand that this is about integration-testing for Maven itself,
but IMO the best way to integration-test any Maven system - be it the
core or a plugin - is to create a series of builds that use the
feature under test. Therefore, core integration-tests
On 7 Jun 07, at 3:00 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey wrote:
I'll take the integration-testing tasks. Kenney and I have talked a
bit about some of this stuff, so it'd be a natural extension to
those discussions.
These are specifically out integration tests for Maven itself, not
the plugin integ
I'll take the integration-testing tasks. Kenney and I have talked a
bit about some of this stuff, so it'd be a natural extension to those
discussions.
-john
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, I pushed all these into the MPA JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavi
Ok, I pushed all these into the MPA JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/
field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10332&fixfor=13535
I've taken for myself:
- Come up with a minimal workflow for JIRA
- Clean up JIRA (not going to do i
On 07/06/2007, at 12:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I stand by my case that all of us should be working on this list to
put us in a position to talk in a meaningful way about any
implementation of anything being replace.
In that case...
I would like to champion the re-initiation of the devel
On 6 Jun 07, at 12:55 AM 6 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 06/06/2007, at 2:06 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Is this different/related to the design paper you were working on?
As I've said before, I'm interested in collaborating on this, and
would like to see it posted somewhere.
No, he sta
On 06/06/2007, at 2:06 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Is this different/related to the design paper you were working on?
As I've said before, I'm interested in collaborating on this, and
would like to see it posted somewhere.
No, he started on this prior to what I started. I have the
underly
On 5 Jun 07, at 11:33 PM 5 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 06/06/2007, at 5:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John has started an API cleanup for artifact resolution and one is
slated for maven-project but the second we promote these we are
really bound to support them and the one that are there
On 06/06/2007, at 5:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John has started an API cleanup for artifact resolution and one is
slated for maven-project but the second we promote these we are
really bound to support them and the one that are there now are
unsupportable.
Is this different/related to t
10 matches
Mail list logo
