It might be clearer to annotate the diagram, rather than have a
separate key table.
On 3 January 2014 14:41, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
>> OK, so to start working on new
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Tutorial%3A+Maven+in+60+seconds
Still think that it is overly vague.
It would be easier to understand if the passive voice was eliminated.
Makes it clearer to understand what the developer has to do and what
maven is going to do while processing
Also, in case it is not clear, my preferred style is to tell you
information that is important later without distracting you by that
information
A case in point is the information that
> The list of modules in the reactor is sorted in order to ensure that any
dependencies that will be created by
FYI here is my current plan for content:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/New+Main+Site
On 3 January 2014 16:27, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I agree with Robert's comment.
> There is a danger that the page will become architecturally elegant and
> will correctly describe all of the p
On 3 January 2014 16:09, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
>>> somethi
Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly
:
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
My first draft did not have the gr
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
> clear for new Maven users.
> Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
>
My first draft did not have the graph at the top... perhaps it would be
better suited at the bot
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
I think you should split the current model into pieces:
A project model contains:
- dependencies
- a build plan
- other project models ( you can call t
Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> OK, so to start working on new content I created some pages on the wiki:
>
> The first page is a 60 seconds overview of Maven's build process
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/co
OK, so to start working on new content I created some pages on the wiki:
The first page is a 60 seconds overview of Maven's build process
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Tutorial:+Maven+in+60+seconds
I am using icons because I want to have subsequent pages give more detail
and
The motivation for 2.3 of JXR was to get a new pair of aggregate
goals. Unfortunately, due to the an interesting division of labor in
the javadoc plugin, I missed a step, and the test I cribbed from
javadoc didn't notice, either.
I fixed this stuff up today, and I propose to rename 2.4 in JIRA to
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-73?page=all ]
Brett Porter updated MSITE-73:
--
Fix Version: 2.0
> new site code fails to generate banner images in projects other than site.xml
> owning p
new site code fails to generate banner images in projects other than site.xml
owning project
Key: MSITE-73
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-73
Project: Maven 2.x Site
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1427?page=all ]
Jason van Zyl closed MNG-1427:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Document is now present.
> "Dependency Scope" not documented in the new site
> -
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1427?page=comments#action_50138 ]
Brett Porter commented on MNG-1427:
---
grr.
If we are doing a link checker, it would be good to identify orphaned docs also.
> "Dependency Scope" not documented in
"Dependency Scope" not documented in the new site
-
Key: MNG-1427
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1427
Project: Maven 2
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation - guides
Reporter: Fabrice
; I agree that should be fixed too.
>
Allright! :) Sorry about the -1! Definitely a +100 for the guides part!
-- Kenney
> > Otherwise: +1 reduction of the amount of menu items shown - it was
> > very hard to find stuff - not sure this is the way to go though;
> > groupin
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 00:19 -0400, John Casey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
>
> I think we just need to keep in mind that this will probably have to be
> republished for fine tuning in the near future, as the community
> identifies/votes for the most important ar
wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
| it to the main site:
|
| http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
|
| You'll notice I've reduced the navigation on the left and placed all the
| documentation here:
|
| http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/guides/index.html
rouping guides is fine, but some info has gone from the main page and it
> isn't clear to me where it can be found now.
>
>
> -- Kenney
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
> > it to the main site:
&
tion -> not really docs, just reports. But that's a
> > problem of the site:site plugin.
> >
> > 6) 'Introduction' and 'About maven' are the same page.
> >
> > Otherwise: +1 reduction of the amount of menu items shown - it was
> > very
is the way to go though;
> grouping guides is fine, but some info has gone from the main page and it
> isn't clear to me where it can be found now.
>
>
> -- Kenney
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
nd it
isn't clear to me where it can be found now.
-- Kenney
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
> it to the main site:
>
> http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
>
> You'll notice I've reduced the navigation on t
I think the link to
http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/plugins/index.html should be made
more clear.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 10/14/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
> it to th
+1
Vincent
2005/10/14, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
> it to the main site:
>
> http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
>
> You'll notice I've reduced the n
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>What specifically and I can do that later today.
>
>
I'd start with a clean slate. Basically like the m1 front page:
- very brief intro
- download box
- news
- pointers on where to start so you don't have to use the navigation
All rest sounds good to me. Especially ridding
I can't look at xdocs anymore.
> - Brett
>
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
> >it to the main site:
> >
> >http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
> >
> >Y
I don't know whether we might want
to write some link rewrites for the old docs?
- Brett
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
>it to the main site:
>
>http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
>
>You'
Hi,
in http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/guides/index.html there are two
links for "Guide to creating a multi-module build", and the last one is
wrong.
Juan.
On Friday 14 October 2005 17:38, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted offer out the new site layou
+1
Informations in http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/general.html#available-plugins are
incorrect. Plugins are at http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/ like other artifacts
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Hi,
Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
it to the
Hi,
Just wanted offer out the new site layout for a vote before publishing
it to the main site:
http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/
You'll notice I've reduced the navigation on the left and placed all the
documentation here:
http://www.codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/maven2/guides/index.h
It's not fixed, but reduced in likelihood. Previously, the width of
source boxes was fixed at 955px, I changed that to 100%. As soon as you
resize the window below the width of the page, it drops down under the
nav again.
I think we can close it won't fix, personally :)
- Brett
Lukas Theussl wro
What is it that fixed it? Can we close MPXDOC-101 now?
-Lukas
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Brett,
You solved the problem! Works fine for me on IE (and firefox)
http://maven.apache.org/maven2/getting-started.html
Good work for the new CSS!
Regards,
Vincent
-
2 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: new site
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >I have some comments:
> >
> >* The text font for the main text is too small for me. I think it should
> be
> >of the same size as the menu. See
> >http://www.apache.or
Ah, it was on some elements but I'd removed it forgetting to put it at
the top level.
Will do.
- Brett
Jörg Schaible wrote:
>Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:43 PM:
>
>
>
>>here is the proposed new site:
>>http://people.apache.org/~br
Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:43 PM:
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
>
> any final objections?
Set white as background color in the CSS. If the brows
ess the same
entries, for example, does not continuum exist for maven 2? does not
maven 2 have any plugins?
/Christian Andersson
Brett Porter wrote:
here is the proposed new site:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
http://people.apache.
Vincent Massol wrote:
>I have some comments:
>
>* The text font for the main text is too small for me. I think it should be
>of the same size as the menu. See
>http://www.apache.org/~vmassol/maven-site-comment-small-text.jpg
>
>* The table items are in very small font making it very hard to read.
Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: mardi 4 octobre 2005 20:43
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: new site
> >
> > here is the proposed new site:
> >
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Jason van Zyl wrote:
+1 (no objections) - much better!
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 04:42 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> > here is the proposed new site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> > http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-si
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 04:42 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
>
> any final objections?
+1
We can adjust anything later. I agree with Vincent it'
Mark
On 04/10/05, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > here is the proposed new site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
>
> You forgot the maven logo on the right of the header in the m2 site.
>
> > http://people.apache.org/
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 4 octobre 2005 20:43
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: new site
>
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.ap
>
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
You forgot the maven logo on the right of the header in the m2 site.
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
It's ok for me
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
here is the proposed new site:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
any final objections?
- Brett
---
here is the proposed new site:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
any final objections?
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>+0
>Are your changes done only on the CSS ?
>If yes : +1
>Can you provide it to us? We are working on the xdoc plugin for m1.1 and we
>are interested to test it as soon as possible
>
>
Yes, it is just CSS. I will incorporate it into the M1 and M2 plugins -
I'm just waiti
For m1 you can take a look at :
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/xdoc/src/plugin-resources/css/maven-base.css?view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/xdoc/src/plugin-resources/css/maven-theme.css?view=markup
Arnaud
On 8/3/05, Henning
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:02 +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Question: Is there documentation somewhere how you can influence the
> > > site build with your own style sheet? And which CSS tags must be
> > > defined for the site to build?
>
I've had a bit more of a think about it, and I like 31 - the colour in
the opening paragraph is a bit strong for me in the others.
I'd like to look at alternatives for the Maven logo itself, but this is
better than the current one ;)
I wonder if we want (or maybe are obliged) to put the current A
On 8/2/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question: Is there documentation somewhere how you can influence the
> > site build with your own style sheet? And which CSS tags must be
> > defined for the site to build?
> The properties you can set are described at
> http://maven.apache.o
Vincent Massol wrote:
If I had to choose between the 3 I'd say 31. I find 32 and 33 too "heavy" in
colors and I prefer simplicity.
Same for me. 31 or even lighter than that.
R.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 2 août 2005 17:37
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: New Site CSS
>
> Howdy,
>
> Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and just
> wanted to see
Hi Jason,
I found the design very good but what about the size to download ?
Personnally I prefer the 31.
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 2 août 2005 17:37
> À : Maven Developers List
>
If I may point out something that is a pet hate of mine... I really
don't like it when people hijack an email for their own thread. In
future, could you start a new subject with WAS: please? The headers will
keep the original reference intact.
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>Question: Is there
The properties you can set are described at
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/xdoc/properties.html
On 8/2/05, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Howdy,
>
> >Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and j
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Howdy,
>Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and just
>wanted to see what other folks thought. Was hoping we could decide on
>one of the following choices here:
>http://codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/mavensites/
Question: Is there document
Howdy,
Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and just
wanted to see what other folks thought. Was hoping we could decide on
one of the following choices here:
http://codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/mavensites/
31,32, or 33
The design can be revised later, but this would be a starting
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-429?page=all ]
Emmanuel Venisse closed MNG-429:
Resolution: Fixed
Done with plexus-site-renderer
> Use Velocity and Doxia to create a new site rendering t
Use Velocity and Doxia to create a new site rendering tool
--
Key: MNG-429
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-429
Project: Maven 2
Type: New Feature
Versions: 2.0-alpha-3
Reporter: Jason van
Vincent Massol wrote:
Ok, I remember seeing this message now that you mention it... ;-) However
the message I got seemed to indicate there was a problem with permissions.
It doesn't seem that the directories are group writable (or I am not in the
group)?
I've just run g+w. I'll have to check int
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 11 février 2005 23:53
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Using the new site plugin from svn trunk?
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have bui
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
I have built the site plugin from svn trunk and when I was trying to use it
upload a plugin web site, I got:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=110645238621134&w=2
Please don't publish the main Maven site though - just do it for
plugins. My home direct
Hi,
I have built the site plugin from svn trunk and when I was trying to use it
upload a plugin web site, I got:
[snip]
site:local-deploy-init:
[echo]
site clean = false
siteDirectory =
/home/brett/public_html/maven-stage-site/reference/plugins/clover/
site:remote-deploy-init:
d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:38 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: RE : New site layout
>
>
> Is it me, or is there no content behind the nav links?
>
I think there's no content because it is the same thing for me :-)
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 16:38
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: RE : New site layout
>
>
> Is it me,
html
>
> Actually I don't see it in the current menu nor in your site.
>
> Arnaud.
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 08:57
> > À : 'Maven Developers List'
nvoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 08:57
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: New site layout
>
>
> Looks good to me content-wise. I have no issue with the look
> either :-)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Br
Looks good to me content-wise. I have no issue with the look either :-)
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 May 2004 07:35
> To: Maven Developers List ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Subject: New site layout
>
>
> - The bullet points are a little obtrusive and clash with the
> menu separators, e.g. IDE Integration and Propoganda
Just the same as normal in xdoc though?
> - Run a spell check for 'Propaganda'
Thanks.
>
> Did you want feedback about the content/structure or just layout etc?
Definitely t
- The bullet points are a little obtrusive and clash with the menu
separators, e.g. IDE Integration and Propoganda
- Run a spell check for 'Propaganda'
Did you want feedback about the content/structure or just layout etc?
On Wed, 26 May 2004 15:34:35 +1000, Brett Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have started the layout for the new Maven site as we approach 1.0 and
start to make space for the subprojects like Wagon, SCM and so on.
http://www.apache.org/~brett/maven-site-2/
So far just the new navigation and some stuff is missing from the old one,
but feedback is welcome.
Cheer
72 matches
Mail list logo
