Quoting Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
After an epiphany, I found the problem: A corrupt JAR file in the
repository. I've opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3523
The bug is still there in 2.0.9. I've downloaded the source and the bug
lurks in this code:
MavenPluginCollector.java
Quoting Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The bug is still there in 2.0.9. I've downloaded the source and the bug
lurks in this code:
MavenPluginCollector.java:
public PluginDescriptor getPluginDescriptor( Plugin plugin )
{
// TODO:
Quoting Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The bug is still there in 2.0.9. I've downloaded the source and the
bug lurks in this code:
MavenPluginCollector.java:
public PluginDescriptor getPluginDescriptor( Plugin plugin )
{
// TODO: include version, but can't do this in the
Aaron Digulla schrieb:
> Brian E. Fox schrieb:
>
>> I think it's safer to leave it at beta-6. Most people aren't expressing any
>> issues and if anyone has trouble, they can manually lock to beta-5. This is
>> safer than potentially downgrading everyone.
>
> beta-6 doesn't work for me at all. I
Brian E. Fox schrieb:
> I think it's safer to leave it at beta-6. Most people aren't expressing any
> issues and if anyone has trouble, they can manually lock to beta-5. This is
> safer than potentially downgrading everyone.
beta-6 doesn't work for me at all. I suddenly get:
java.lang.IllegalS
lock to beta-5. This is safer than potentially downgrading everyone.
-Original Message-
From: Bouiaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:51 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: problem with site-plugin 2.0-beta-6
Hi,
Just an information that is important
l 02, 2008 11:51 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: problem with site-plugin 2.0-beta-6
Hi,
Just an information that is important (from my point of view) to know.
Site plugin beta-6 has an important issue (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-270) : with multi modules projects,
menus
t; but that may potentially downgrade some users.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:34 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: problem with site-plugin 2.0-beta-6
>
> I've had problems with b
:34 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: problem with site-plugin 2.0-beta-6
I've had problems with beta-6 too - I wonder if we should stick with
beta-5 in 2.0.9?
I'm unsure why 2.0.8 was using beta-5 while 2.0.9 uses beta-6, as
David said that it was not specified in his P
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:18 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ran 209rc6 and as a side effect the site-plugin version got resolved to
> 2.0-beta-6 which gave me the following problem:
...
>
> [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
> [DEBUG] Mapped url: /tmp/dnbnorapi-trunk/src/site to relative path:
I've had problems with beta-6 too - I wonder if we should stick with
beta-5 in 2.0.9?
I'm unsure why 2.0.8 was using beta-5 while 2.0.9 uses beta-6, as
David said that it was not specified in his POMs on IRC.
Cheers,
Brett
On 02/04/2008, at 7:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ran 209rc6 a
Ran 209rc6 and as a side effect the site-plugin version got resolved to
2.0-beta-6 which gave me the following problem:
[DEBUG] Configuring mojo
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:2.0-beta-6:attach-descriptor'
-->
[DEBUG] (f) artifact = no.dnbnor.api:api:pom:1.3-SNAPSHOT
[DEBUG]
12 matches
Mail list logo
