Re: Review Request 26382: [WIP] Annotate TASK_LOST with source. Consider TASK_INVALID for some cases.

2014-10-09 Thread Dominic Hamon
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/ --- (Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 7:07 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. Ch

Re: Review Request 26382: [WIP] Annotate TASK_LOST with source. Consider TASK_INVALID for some cases.

2014-10-09 Thread Alexander Rukletsov
> On Oct. 7, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > OK. Here is a proposal for what it could look like. > > > > > > General idea: We should add as few top level task states as possible > > because it is more work for frameworks. TASK_LOST should be used for cases > > where we expect a relaunc

Re: Review Request 26382: [WIP] Annotate TASK_LOST with source. Consider TASK_INVALID for some cases.

2014-10-08 Thread Mesos ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/#review55936 --- Bad patch! Reviews applied: [26382] Failed command: ./support/meso

Re: Review Request 26382: [WIP] Annotate TASK_LOST with source. Consider TASK_INVALID for some cases.

2014-10-08 Thread Dominic Hamon
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/ --- (Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 1:18 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. Ch