Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27501/#review61589 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Niklas Nielsen On Nov. 14, 2014, 4:01 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27501/ --- (Updated Nov. 15, 2014, 12:01 a.m.) Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie Y

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27501/ --- (Updated Nov. 14, 2014, 11:16 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie Y

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

> On Nov. 11, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp, line 3314 > > > > > > It's hard to pick up (from the call site) what the last bool does - how > > about having a update()

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

> On Nov. 11, 2014, 11:14 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp, line 3314 > > > > > > It's hard to pick up (from the call site) what the last bool does - how > > about having a update()

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27501/#review60866 --- 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp

Re: Review Request 27501: Simplified redundant Clock::order/update usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27501/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2014, 4:52 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu