Re: [DISCUSS] Checking-in "red" unit tests reproducing bugs.

In Scala, the test frameworks allow you to include a "pendingUntilFixed" annotation [1]. IMHO this is a really good way to check-in tests that are still pending. Not sure how to mimic this behaviour with plain junit though :( [1] https://etorreborre.github.io/specs2/guide/SPECS2-3.5/org.specs2.gu

[jira] [Updated] (METAMODEL-167) SELECT * from multiple tables with WHERE clause causes duplication of SelectItems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Guzialek updated METAMODEL-167: -- Attachment: METAMODEL-167.patch Unit test reproducing the issue. > SELECT * from mul

Re: [DISCUSS] Checking-in "red" unit tests reproducing bugs.

I personally don't like working with diffs. But will try to make friends with them, sounds like a reasonable idea to use them for bug reproducing purposes. Pozdrawiam / Regards / Med venlig hilsen Tomasz Guziałek 2015-11-29 9:30 GMT+01:00 Kasper Sørensen : > I think that also sounds like a good

[jira] [Resolved] (METAMODEL-99) Neo4j connector.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomasz Guzialek resolved METAMODEL-99. -- Resolution: Fixed Read-only version of the connector merged to master. > Neo4j connec

Re: [DISCUSS] Checking-in "red" unit tests reproducing bugs.

I think that also sounds like a good idea. Agree that rarely the branch is needed. 2015-11-28 13:09 GMT+01:00 Du Krøger, Dennis < dennis.dukro...@humaninference.com>: > Hmmm... How about just attaching it as a diff to the related issue > description? > > Since there is no actual functionality, "o