Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.0.0

2017-11-06 Thread Dennis Du Krøger
Hi all, Sorry to be late, but I changed job, and for some reason used my work email for the MM list messages. I can't really get the old email messages as anything reply-able (as far as I can tell), so this will probably not appear in the proper threaded view. Sorry about that. +1 Best rega

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.0.0

2017-11-06 Thread Kasper Sørensen
Normally if I'm upgrading a project that I depend on from e.g. 4.x to 5.x, then I would expect differences and do some testing to make sure everything in the upgrade fits my bill. But you do have a point of course. I say we extent the vote for another 24 hours to see if any other PMC members have

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.0.0

2017-11-06 Thread unbehauen
Hi Kasper, this feature should be released in 5.0.0 (i am @tomatophantastico on github), just the schedule is quite tight. When i build my project against master (thanks for the great work btw.), i had to do some adjustments (i.e. filter tables & dealing with other table types) that i did

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.0.0

2017-11-06 Thread Kasper Sørensen
Hi Jörg, Thank you for the feedback. But the way I see it there are two counter-arguments to what you're saying ... (1) Being a major release (5.0.0), changing behavior is warranted and clearly signalled, and the time is right to do so now, not in any other kind of release. (2) There is a system

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.0.0

2017-11-06 Thread Jörg Unbehauen
-1 Sorry for being late, but while i really like METAMODEL-1165 and appreciate having it shipped with MM 5.0, it changes the behavior without an API change, so unsuspecting users might run into trouble. I suggest to either create an other RC, or turn it off by default. Best, Jörg Am 06.1