Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624#discussion_r124317746
--- Diff: .travis.yml ---
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ before_install:
- export PATH=$M2_HOME/bin:$PATH
script:
- |
--- End diff
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624
As a note, what I have is currently the first steps towards reusing infra.
It's not perfect, and it's not reused across classes.
There was an attempt to use the build matrix to split
GitHub user justinleet reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624
[DO NOT MERGE] METRON-1004: Travis CI - Job Exceeded Maximum Time Limit
## Contributor Comments
Given that Apache travis fails more often, I'm using this PR to hopefully
hit the skidoo
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624
I moved work from a mostly unrelated branch over here. Specifically, it
attempts to get the InMemoryComponents to be reused across a given test class.
This is particularly helpful
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/615
+1 by inspection, thanks a lot!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/586
@JonZeolla Can you deconflict this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/586#discussion_r122717740
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-parsers/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/parsers/bro/BasicBroParserTest.java
---
@@ -241,8 +380,754 @@ public void
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/607#discussion_r122700117
--- Diff:
metron-interface/metron-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/rest/service/impl/StormStatusServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -49,6 +44,11 @@ public
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530#discussion_r121161467
--- Diff:
metron-extensions/metron-parser-extensions/metron-parser-bro-extension/metron-parser-bro/src/main/config/zookeeper/enrichments/bro.json
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530#discussion_r121157776
--- Diff: bundles-maven-plugin/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+
+# Apache Metron Bundle Maven Plugin
--- End diff --
With my limited
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/606
Thanks for submitting this, and thanks for the responses to the notes. I'm
+1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/609
@cestella Perfect. Definitely didn't want to imply that belongs in this
ticket at all. I'm in full support of it being backwards compatible for now,
and keeping the discussion of how we prune
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/614#discussion_r120964479
--- Diff: metron-platform/Performance-tuning-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
+# Metron Performance Tunining Guide
+
+## Overview
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/614#discussion_r120964036
--- Diff: metron-platform/Performance-tuning-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
+# Metron Performance Tunining Guide
--- End diff
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/609#discussion_r120932742
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/message/JSONFromPosition.java
---
@@ -40,10 +40,12 @@ public
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/606#discussion_r120926071
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/stellar/StellarCompiler.java
---
@@ -76,14 +93,80 @@ public Expression
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/609#discussion_r120919459
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/message/JSONFromPosition.java
---
@@ -40,10 +40,12 @@ public
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/609#discussion_r120921756
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-enrichment/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/enrichment/adapters/stellar/StellarAdapterTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,134
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/609
A lot of this brings up the discussions around deprecating / dropping
functionality (both for Stellar and in general). It seems like ideally, we'd
be deprecating the map functionality in favor
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/579
Just the start. I got the previously existing test cases in a better
shape, and @ctramnitz should be able to add on pretty easily.
I do want to echo what @mattf-horton said about
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/579
https://github.com/ctramnitz/metron/pull/1 opened, if anyone cares. As
noted,
https://github.com/ctramnitz/metron/commit/bf8ce62cb5ed3846f288e4a7a606410ebbaf9d30
is the relevant commit
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/579
I lied, it's a bit circular. It depends on your PR's fixes, so let's go
back to the original strategy of making a PR against your branch. I'm more
than happy to give up credit, since
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/579
Actually, I'll just open a separate ticket/PR. You'll still want to merge
it in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530
@ottobackwards I agree the feature branch approach is probably the best way
to handle things like this. It naturally splits things into a smaller chunks,
and it eliminates the need for all
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530
@ottobackwards I definitely agree that we need more documentation around
absolutely everything you listed. The main reason I want the outline for
adding a new parser is just so I have a way
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530
@nickwallen I agree in philosophy, but this has been a running PR for
awhile that had plenty of dev list discussion around it before it was made.
There's already follow-on work being done
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/612
@kylerichardson What is the difference between the `BasicAsaParser` and the
`GrokAsaParser`? Are you able to shed some light on why both exist? The
motivation for the question is that minor
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/602#discussion_r120614845
--- Diff: metron-deployment/roles/ambari_config/vars/single_node_vm.yml ---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ configurations:
required_configurations
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/530#discussion_r120369783
--- Diff: bundles-lib/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLS
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/579
I just kicked up https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/612, which
theoretically fixes the unit tests (and simplifies them a lot). Straight
replacing the logs would work, but we might want
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/612
METRON-962: Configuration Based Unit Tests and Add integration tests
## Contributor Comments
Admittedly, this mixes a couple things together. I originally intended to
get rid of JUnit3
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/600
@mattf-horton Updated with a more explicit set of unit tests around it and
a comment explaining the assumption made by the function. Let me know if
there's anything else you want or need to make
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/600#discussion_r120434003
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/utils/KafkaUtils.java
---
@@ -68,12 +68,14 @@
return ret
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/600#discussion_r120369355
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/utils/KafkaUtils.java
---
@@ -68,12 +68,14 @@
return ret
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/607#discussion_r120367143
--- Diff:
metron-interface/metron-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/rest/service/impl/StormStatusServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -49,6 +44,11 @@ public
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/605
@mattf-horton is correct, I am +1 on this. Thanks a lot for working on
this, it's great to have.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/606#discussion_r119832707
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/common/stellar/StellarTest.java
---
@@ -634,6 +679,40 @@ public void
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/606#discussion_r119831834
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/common/stellar/StellarTest.java
---
@@ -33,19 +31,66 @@
import
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/605#discussion_r119767454
--- Diff: metron-deployment/Kerberos-manual-setup.md ---
@@ -382,18 +380,18 @@ Push Data
1. Push some sample data to one of the parser topics. E.g
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/507
I'm +1, by inspection. I think this covers it. I'll let @nickwallen
double check if there's anything else.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/600
METRON-976 KafkaUtils doesn't handle SASL_PLAINTEXT
## Contributor Comments
Used @cestella's original implementation before I apparently foolishly
assumed we'd get Java compliant URIs. See
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/595
+1, looks good and shows up in UI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/598
+1 by inspection, pending Travis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/507
@mmiklavc Can you take care of the conflicts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/520
@cestella Can you deconflict this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/550
@cestella Any update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/577
Resolved conflicts.
@mmiklavc I think you said on another PR that you'd seen some issues with
the Google formatting? Any update on that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/581#discussion_r118785519
--- Diff: metron-interface/metron-config/scripts/package.json ---
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
"http-proxy-middleware": "0.17.4",
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/581#discussion_r118625900
--- Diff: metron-interface/metron-config/scripts/package.json ---
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
"http-proxy-middleware": "0.17.4",
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/591
@JonZeolla Sounds like Otto got his commit working. You should be good to
try this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/594
+1 by inspection. Thanks a lot for cleaning this up!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/596
Are there any unit tests we can/should add to add this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/591
+1 by inspection. Good catch, and thanks for fixing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/588
I'm +1. Thanks for adding this. @ottobackwards You need to see anything on
this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116823693
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/HDFSWriterCallback.java
---
@@ -116,7 +117,11 @@ public
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/567
I'm set, +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116795288
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/deserializer/KeyValueDeserializer.java
---
@@ -28,6 +26,17
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/589
I'm +1 by inspection, thanks for the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584
Same here, +1. Thanks a lot for the contribution, this makes a big
difference.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116742092
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/deserializer/KeyValueDeserializer.java
---
@@ -28,6 +26,17
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116741150
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/PartitionHDFSWriter.java
---
@@ -102,14 +106,43 @@ public void
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116741758
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/PartitionHDFSWriter.java
---
@@ -183,14 +219,14 @@ private void
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/585#discussion_r116739444
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/spout/pcap/PartitionHDFSWriter.java
---
@@ -102,14 +106,43 @@ public void
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584
I ran up the main topologies last night and everything seemed to correlate
correctly and ran without issue. Hadn't run up pcap yet, but it look like
@mmiklavc is working on validating it. Given
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/590
METRON-953: Complete migration away from incubator-metron to metron for
links and docs
## Contributor Comments
Moving "incubator-metron" to "metron" everywhere other th
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116564604
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka-override/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116566613
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/storm/kafka/flux/SimpleStormKafkaBuilder.java
---
@@ -202,31 +240,4
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116568707
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -106,7 +122,7 @@
but I justify it by noting that this should be able to be
removed when we migrate
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/587
I'll create a ticket and take care of it. I have a lot of this already
done, while I was looking through last night. I was hoping to get a
comprehensive ticket out with this change, but I'm
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/587
I actually also noticed this last night, and was about to put in a patch
until I realized there's a good amount of documentation in general that needs
to point to the newer repos, and our docs
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/577
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/577
METRON-746: Build Custom Checkstyle and IDE formatting settings
## Contributor Comments
Pretty much just editing the POM to actually set up Checkstyle with the
Google Code
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/575
@mattf-horton Thanks for catching that. Merged it in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/573
METRON-943: Create traffic connections report in zeppelin
## Contributor Comments
Adds a Zeppelin dashboard that lets the user get connection counts filtered
by a CIDR block
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/563
@nickwallen @merrimanr Looks like the REST Ambari stuff. I probably should
have caught it in review, but it looks like our blueprint needs updating to
reflect it.
---
If your project
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/500
+1 pending Travis, thanks for taking care of the various comments and fixes
here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
@mmiklavc That order is correct, yes. Updated the main PR with a
strikethrough and replace of the original.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
After looking at this some more, I split out the `mvn clean install` from
`mvn site site:stage-deploy site:deploy`. Things got interleaved oddly and
gave a similar package vs. install
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/556
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/556
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5077341/25616072/a91ab55c-2f08-11e7-82a0-1edc95364906.png;>
With the bracketed time windows following the other panes.
---
If y
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/556
Updated with the Bro split, removing aggregate paragraphs, and Snort
verbiage. Working on histogram.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/500
I was able to run this up in a nonkerberized cluster, and then set up
Kerberos. Mostly things worked, but I spun out two tickets from this,
[METRON-909](https://issues.apache.org/jira
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
Ran this up for a little while in down time over the last couple days.
These counts include the previous updates (so 2 additional failures and 15
successes, and 1 additional failure
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
Updated after merging in master, which included the README fixes as well as
moving the Ambari instructions alongside the Manual instructions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
To elaborate on the regression comment:
The vagrant Kerberos steps have all the manual steps added back in. They
should largely be removed, barring any profiler ACL setup
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
Imo, the vagrant one should be moved up to the level of the manual one, and
just made to be the Ambari Kerberos doc with any notes for full dev.
Combining them is kind of a pain
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/541
+1, pending Travis. Was able to spin this up and full dev and everything
worked as expected. Thanks a lot for the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user justinleet reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
METRON-896: Document Having Kerberos Issue Renewable Tickets
## Contributor Comments
Added a couple lines to the doc about setting up tickets as renewable, if
they aren't already
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/553
METRON-896: Document Having Kerberos Issue Renewable Tickets
## Contributor Comments
Added a couple lines to the doc about setting up tickets as renewable, if
they aren't already
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
To my surprise, I just ran 17 times overnight on the branch with no issues.
I'm going to repeat this over the next couple nights for both master and the
branch, because having
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/541#discussion_r113468302
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-pcap/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/pcap/filter/fixed/FixedPcapFilter.java
---
@@ -21,76 +21,131
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
For the errors on master:
[master_error.txt](https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/files/958364/master_error.txt)
4 BUILD FAILURE
8 BUILD SUCCESS
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/459
@cestella I wish, I'd have been more than willing to ignore issues if it
was. I'm scraping together a more concise version of the some of the logs and
will post them.
---
If your
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/549
A PR was opened up at https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/552.
Given that both involve spinning up quick/full dev, I'm personally inclined to
hold off on the revert
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/538
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/544#discussion_r112961515
--- Diff: metron-deployment/vagrant/full-dev-platform/README.md ---
@@ -24,35 +26,38 @@ Any platform that supports these tools is suitable
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/538
@mmiklavc Added a quick note, and listed those dependencies off. Let me
know if there's anything else you want in there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
401 - 500 of 504 matches
Mail list logo
