Re: [DISCUSS] Kerberos Support

2017-03-25 Thread Casey Stella
Actually, METRON-797 (https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/490) is inspired by that work, Dave. Specifically here are the differences: - The mpack work is not included - It's based on 793, so it uses storm-kafka-client rather than storm-kafka - It adds a flag when starting

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #488: METRON-796: Mpack uses wrong group for owning H...

2017-03-25 Thread dlyle65535
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/488 I don't have an objection. I made that change because there was some issue with user_group. Unfortunately, I can't remember exactly what that was. In it's current state, what's the

Re: [DISCUSS] Kerberos Support

2017-03-25 Thread David Lyle
Sounds good to me. A few of us did some initial exploration on that topic a week or so back. The branch is here: https://github.com/dlyle65535/incubator-metron/tree/kerb-testing?files=1 It contains a prototype quality version of everything you've identified except METRON-793 and the probes. If

Re: Metron Installation on an Ambari-Managed Cluster?

2017-03-25 Thread David Lyle
A cool thing about the MPack is that you can now leverage blueprints [1] in an automated way. I'm traveling this week, so this is from my phone, please excuse if there are more typos than usual The overall flow is pretty much what we're doing in Ansible (it uses blueprints under the hood).

Re: Metron Installation on an Ambari-Managed Cluster?

2017-03-25 Thread zeo...@gmail.com
Just to add onto this, that is a feature I have similarly been looking for but my environment hasn't matured enough yet for me to push the topic. I've been installing various versions of master in my hardware environment using Ansible, but ever since the Ambari mpack I have been doing it more