http://mina.apache.org/reporting-a-bug.html
On 1/23/07, sishen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my application, i use mina 1.1 version.
Now i do some perfermance test. Below is my test case.
loop (50) {
client send message to server. (500 client one time).
sleep 1s.
}
And in the ex
On 1/23/07, afa654321 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any limitation on the inital capacity of
"org.apache.mina.common.ByteBuffer"
The following line of code fails with the below-mentioned exceptoin:
int capacity = 214748;
org.apache.mina.common.ByteBuffer byteBuffer =
org.apache.min
-- Forwarded message --
From: sishen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 23, 2007 6:44 PM
Subject: The server stop response. dead lock?
To: mina-dev@directory.apache.org
In my application, i use mina 1.1 version.
Now i do some perfermance test. Below is my test case.
loop (50) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466923
]
Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-261:
-
I contacted Sun to report this behavior. They gave me the URL of the fol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-337.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Trustin Lee
Your patch has been applied to the trunk. Thanks!
I'll try to look into this. It will be a couple of weeks before I
really start to dig deep into the POSIX AIO stuff. I'm hoping to do
some performance comparisons between Linux and Solaris which may be
interesting. My goal is to be able to build more scalable network
servers with MINA. I will d
On 1/23/07, Akbar Munir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. It works. I believe this would also reduce the time that my
connection thread would wait for the session to be established?
No, it wouldn't. It is a timeout only applied when there's no connection
attempts to manage.
Though I have n
Newcomb, Michael-P57487 wrote:
> When you install filters on the SocketAcceptor, those are all shared
> between sessions created by that acceptor. Can you install filters on a
> per-IoSession basis (eg. filters unique to that one session)?
>
>
Certainly!
In IoHandler.sessionCreated() you can do
When you install filters on the SocketAcceptor, those are all shared
between sessions created by that acceptor. Can you install filters on a
per-IoSession basis (eg. filters unique to that one session)?
Thanks,
Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maarten Bosteels updated DIRMINA-337:
-
Attachment: patch.txt
trivial fix
> SwingChatClient example throws NPE
> --
SwingChatClient example throws NPE
--
Key: DIRMINA-337
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-337
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M1
Reporter: Maarten Bosteels
Thanks. It works. I believe this would also reduce the time that my
connection thread would wait for the session to be established?
Though I have not looked in to the code, but I was curious as to why the
timeout timer can not be killed if it has determined that the connection can
not be establis
In my application, i use mina 1.1 version.
Now i do some perfermance test. Below is my test case.
loop (50) {
client send message to server. (500 client one time).
sleep 1s.
}
And in the executing, the server stop response. It just hang. However,
sometimes it passed the test.
I sn
Sure, I'll try prepare it soon ... Thank you.
23.01.07, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а):
Eugene Labunsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problem with client package - when link beetwen the client &
> server (both based on MINA 1.0.1) closed client package exit with code
0.
> Sure in t
I have to stop the experiment. The most surprise is that I use pure
C/pthread to implement the similar test, the performance is even bad than
the java version.
I read some material, it was said that the Linux thread and AIO performance
are not so good.
I don't know if it can explain the performanc
15 matches
Mail list logo
