[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-354) Software grant for a KeepAlive functionality

2007-04-09 Thread Trustin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487481 ] Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-354: - It seems like the software grant has not been faxed yet. Please send

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-353) Import AsyncWeb from Safehaus

2007-04-09 Thread Trustin Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487482 ] Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-353: - It seems like the software grant has not been faxed yet. I asked the

Re: A tutorial for JMX integration

2007-04-09 Thread Michael Grundvig
The tutorial says Mina 2.0, is that JMX functionality available in 1.1? Thanks! Mike - Original Message - From: Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@mina.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:45 AM Subject: A tutorial for JMX integration Hi folks, Mark Webb has uploaded a

Re: A tutorial for JMX integration

2007-04-09 Thread Mark Webb
I just tested the code in the tutorial, and it works with versions 1.0 and greater. I updated the tutorial to reflect this. On 4/9/07, Michael Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Mark, the tutorial is very helpful! Mike - Original Message - From: Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A tutorial for JMX integration

2007-04-09 Thread Rodrigo Madera
It would be very helpful if there was a comparison between versions 1.0, 1.1and 2.0, since some things have changed. This document could also be short and up-to-the-point, just so we can get a grasp on things. Anyone has the knowledge to do this? Rodrigo On 4/9/07, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A tutorial for JMX integration

2007-04-09 Thread Mark Webb
I am not sure any of the JMX integration has changed between 1.0 and 2.0. I used the code in the tutorial on all 3 baselines (1.0, 1.1, 2.0) and got the same results. Other than that, I am not sure what else you are looking for. On 4/9/07, Rodrigo Madera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be

Core API comparison document (Was Re: A tutorial for JMX integration)

2007-04-09 Thread Mark Webb
sorry. I thought your email was addressing the JMX tutorial. Should start a new thread as to not confuse the issues. This is probably something that the MINA veterans should tackle. If I gave it a shot, I would probably confuse more people than I would help. On 4/9/07, Rodrigo Madera [EMAIL

Re: a question when learning mina-sm

2007-04-09 Thread Niklas Therning
Coding Horse wrote: Hi, Community, I'm trying to model my app logic with mina-sm framework and reading StateMachineProxyFactoryTest as the start point, like what was suggested by Niklas. There are lines like this: @Handler( on = eject, in = s4, next = s1 ) public void

Question on SSL connections

2007-04-09 Thread Scott Peters
Hello all, I'm writing up a connector framework to use as the back end for our test tools. I have been able to get non-SSL connections to work with up to 10k (20k server+client). The problem is when I try to use SSL. I believe the problem is a race condition since it does not seem to reproduce

Re: Question on SSL connections

2007-04-09 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Scott, On 4/10/07, Scott Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I'm writing up a connector framework to use as the back end for our test tools. I have been able to get non-SSL connections to work with up to 10k (20k server+client). The problem is when I try to use SSL. Glad to hear

Re: Core API comparison document (Was Re: A tutorial for JMX integration)

2007-04-09 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Mark, On 4/10/07, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry. I thought your email was addressing the JMX tutorial. Should start a new thread as to not confuse the issues. This is probably something that the MINA veterans should tackle. If I gave it a shot, I would probably confuse more

Re: Mina token

2007-04-09 Thread Trustin Lee
On 4/10/07, mat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks. Trustin However, is it already in the mina1.0.2? BTW, can I implement my own protocol for ping-pong purpose? It's not included to the official distribution yet. Of course, you could implement yours, too. Trustin -- what we call human nature