[X]: +1, release
[X]: +1, release
On 4/6/07, Uday Prakash (DHL CZ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X]: +1, release
[ ]: 0, abstain
[ ]: -1, don't release
-Original Message-
From: Trustin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:57 AM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release
Trustin,
I am seeing this with the 1.0.3 snapshot. Before that with 1.0.1, 1.0.2 or 1.1
I was not able to get even this amount of regularity in the SSL connnections,
they locked up even more often due to that known deadlock. I believe there is
still a race condition still since the non-SSL
Scott,
On 4/10/07, Scott Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing this with the 1.0.3 snapshot. Before that with 1.0.1, 1.0.2
or 1.1 I was not able to get even this amount of regularity in the SSL
connnections, they locked up even more often due to that known
deadlock. I believe there is
mat wrote:
Thanks. Trustin
However, is it already in the mina1.0.2? BTW, can I implement my own
protocol for ping-pong purpose?
The filter will send whatever message that's specified in the
constructor, so you can use it with whatever protocol.
Trustin: I just noted that the
I have added a tutorial that walks a new user through the process of
developing a MINA based application. In this case, the tutorial shows the
user how to write a time server. Take a look at the document and let me
know what you think.
http://mina.apache.org/quick-start-guide.html
Thank you.
Mark,
Could you also provide a 2.0 version of it?
If you have the opportunity, that would be excellent!
Rodrigo
On 4/10/07, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added a tutorial that walks a new user through the process of
developing a MINA based application. In this case, the tutorial
I could just add a 2.0 section for that part. No need in building 2
tutorials IMO.
On 4/10/07, Rodrigo Madera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great!
Now this should be put on the Wiki...
What do you think Mark? Create a 2.0 version by cloning your article and
renaming?
Rodrigo
On 4/10/07, Maarten
see comments
On 4/10/07, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I think a quick-start-guide for MINA is a very good idea.
(it's something I wanted to contribute myself for a long time, but I kept
postponing it)
So, I will contribute with some constructive remarks :-)
Thanks.
+1
On 4/5/07, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry to bother you by firing two votes at once, but I must admit that
MINA 1.1.0, Java 5 port of MINA 1.0.x is ready to be released IMHO.
Java 5 Generics and covariant return type have been used extensively
so there's no more
1.1 proxy example broken with svn revision: 522721
--
Key: DIRMINA-367
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-367
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Trustin Lee wrote:
On 4/10/07, Niklas Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coding Horse wrote:
Hi, Community,
I'm trying to model my app logic with mina-sm framework and reading
StateMachineProxyFactoryTest as the start point, like what was
suggested by
Niklas.
There are lines like
Hi folks,
Some of you might already have seen these pictures from my blog, but
I'm posting the following link for those who didn't enjoy them. :)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/trustin/sets/72157600058719850/show/
I am not sure people in different countries take this kind of photos,
which is
13 matches
Mail list logo