Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a good idea to schedule changes for M3.
A start of what I'm thinking doable :
- integrating proxy patch
- finishing doc on transports (core/APR/serial)
- doc on reqres filter
- testing and perhaps tuning APR based transport
- composite buffers
Feel
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:01:30 +0200
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
now that Julien has started cutting the 2.0.0.-M2 release, we have to
postpone all the related and unfixed issues to the newly created
2.0.0-M3 version.
We also have 44 unscheduled issues. Would be
Hi,
Following are my requirements from MINA:
1. Around 10k concurrent persistent connections.
2. Message receive rate approx: 1000 msg/sec
3. Message sent rate approx: 20 times receive/input rate.
I am sure that MINA can handle this rate... right?
Currently I am using MINA 1.1.0 but have never
