Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

+1 Jeff On May 31, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on >> windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now >> w

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows #27

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.6-windows » Apache MINA Core #27

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows #24

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.5-windows » Apache MINA Core #24

See

2.0.0 package generation aborted :/

Hi guys, I don't know how possibly we were able to release MINA in the past, but I must admit it's a nightmare. I spent the full afternoon trying to get the packages generated and the 2.0.0 tags to be created, with no success. Not only the poms were all totally broken (with bad references to

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows #23

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.5-windows » Apache MINA Core #23

See

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows #26

See

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.6-windows » Apache MINA Core #26

See

Hudson build is back to stable : MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows #25

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows #22

See

Hudson build is still unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.5-windows » Apache MINA Core #22

See

Hudson build is back to stable : MINA-tr unk-jdk1.6-windows » Apache MINA Core #25

See

Re: Release steps on the MINA web site are totally broken

Hi Emmanuel, It seems to me that the dependency link between several projects is wrong as they are not referring to the correct packaging type ('jar' is inherited as default packaging type, instead of 'bundle' in your case). The attached patch should fix all dependency link issues and should le

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows #21

See

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows #24

See

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.5-windows » Apache MINA Core #21

See

Hudson build became unstable: MINA-tru nk-jdk1.6-windows » Apache MINA Core #24

See

Release steps on the MINA web site are totally broken

Hi guys, I'm trying to package the 2.0 jars, following this page : http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-ReleasingaPointRelease%2528CommittersOnly%2529 It's totally FU. When I run a mvn -Dwith-LGPL-dependencies -DdryRun=true release:prepare (or even the mvn -Dwith-LGPL-depe

MINE pending vote

Hi guys, I will hold the vote for a bit, just for me to generate the packages. It will be done after lunch. In any case, the 72 hours will start *after* the packages will have been provided. Sorry for the latency. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com

Re: I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

Ok, I got the test fixed. I just added the following line in the beginning of the test : java.lang.System.setProperty( "sun.security.ssl.allowUnsafeRenegotiation", "true" ); This is explained in detail here : http://java.sun.com/javase/javaseforbusiness/docs/TLSReadme.html On 5/31/10

Re: I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

On 5/31/10 10:51 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: There was a vulnerability discovered in TLS recently. One fix is to switch off renegotitation. Maybe you are running into this issue, but you'd have to check for yourself. Most certainly the case. The test fails in a call to SSLSocket.startHandsh

Re: I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

There was a vulnerability discovered in TLS recently. One fix is to switch off renegotitation. Maybe you are running into this issue, but you'd have to check for yourself. >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security : A vulnerability of the renegotiation procedure was discov

Re: I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

I am getting the same error :( Me and Emm both are on JDK 1.6 u20 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: >> as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I should have >> added the revision and up

Re: I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I should have > added the revision and uploaded binaries for the vote. So I started to > generate them, and now, on my Mac, I have one error : Do you get this consistently? I

Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now > wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that > m

Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

Le Mon, 31 May 2010 09:18:24 +0200, Niklas Gustavsson a écrit : > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: > > [X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 > > Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as > well :-) > > /niklas +1, as soon the tests are stables :) I won'

I'm the only one having trouble on Mac ?

Hi, as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I should have added the revision and uploaded binaries for the vote. So I started to generate them, and now, on my Mac, I have one error : --- Test se

Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny >wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now >

Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > [X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0 Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as well :-) /niklas

Re: [VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

+1 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on > windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now > wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that > magi

[VOTE] Time for another vote on MINA 2.0 ?

Hi guys, we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that magically the release gets out of the box. My opinion is that the curr