Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-18 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the > org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? > > That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already > has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not

Re: GIT ?

2013-01-09 Thread Alan Cabrera
Yes, wondering where that went too. Regards, Alan On Jan 2, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Ashish wrote: > just curious, we have a sandbox folder.. what would happen to it? > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Julien Vermillard > wrote: > >> Ok I'll run a formal vote and then open the infra issue >>

Re: Release location

2012-12-30 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Dec 26, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > as I discovered today (the information was buried in a mail about the > site migration...), the release should *also* be pushed to svnpubsub. In > other words, we should not move anything in > /www/www.apache.org/dist/mina, but

Re: [MINA3] NIO TCP client

2012-12-30 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > Hi, > Just pushed the NioTcpClient (new name for NioTcpConnector). > It's basically working, I need to finish some stuff like connection timeout. > But if you checkout the code it's very simpler than MINA 2 to dig in. > > I think the next s

[jira] [Updated] (DIRMINA-921) Maven build fails if test phase is given

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921: - Description: If you run a mvn clean test on the root pom, the build fails because the mina

[jira] [Updated] (DIRMINA-921) Maven build fails if test phase is given

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921: - Description: If you run a mvn clean test on the root pom, the build fails because the mina

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-921) Maven build fails if test phase is given

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506490#comment-13506490 ] Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-921: -- (Deleted old msg since I was testing

[jira] [Updated] (DIRMINA-921) Maven build fails if test phase is given

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921: - Comment: was deleted (was: Running mvn clean test at the root works perfectly fine for me. I

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-921) Maven build fails if test phase is given

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506470#comment-13506470 ] Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-921: -- Running mvn clean test at the root w

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-858) write future implementation

2011-09-03 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13096777#comment-13096777 ] Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-858: -- What Future is this? > write

[jira] Resolved: (DIRMINA-707) Add sendfile support to APR transport

2010-01-19 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Cabrera resolved DIRMINA-707. -- Resolution: Fixed Many thanks. > Add sendfile support to APR transp

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-758) APR code needs unit tests

2010-01-19 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802296#action_12802296 ] Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-758: -- Hmmm, good point. How does Tomcat test

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-707) Add sendfile support to APR transport

2010-01-19 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802290#action_12802290 ] Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-707: -- On second thought. I think that hasFile

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-758) APR code needs unit tests

2010-01-19 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
APR code needs unit tests - Key: DIRMINA-758 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-758 Project: MINA Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Alan Cabrera The APR code should be unit tested

[jira] Assigned: (DIRMINA-707) Add sendfile support to APR transport

2010-01-19 Thread Alan Cabrera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Cabrera reassigned DIRMINA-707: Assignee: Alan Cabrera > Add sendfile support to APR transp

Re: [AsyncWeb] Ideas for client

2008-03-12 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 1, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Feb 29, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Mike Heath wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: So, HCF can be optional. If you create HCs directly any cookies that are created are scoped w/ that client. The HCF would take an implementation of a CookieManager

Re: [AsyncWeb] build broken w/ last checkin

2008-03-03 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: AsyncHttpClient was changed w/ the last checkin on 2/26 and now the build is broken. I looked at the actual changes. I'm just trying to grok the changes because I realize that I am new here. It seems that the "old" AsyncHttpClient is s