On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
>
> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already
> has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not
Yes, wondering where that went too.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 2, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Ashish wrote:
> just curious, we have a sandbox folder.. what would happen to it?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Julien Vermillard
> wrote:
>
>> Ok I'll run a formal vote and then open the infra issue
>>
On Dec 26, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as I discovered today (the information was buried in a mail about the
> site migration...), the release should *also* be pushed to svnpubsub. In
> other words, we should not move anything in
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/mina, but
On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
> Just pushed the NioTcpClient (new name for NioTcpConnector).
> It's basically working, I need to finish some stuff like connection timeout.
> But if you checkout the code it's very simpler than MINA 2 to dig in.
>
> I think the next s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921:
-
Description:
If you run a mvn clean test on the root pom, the build fails because the
mina
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921:
-
Description:
If you run a mvn clean test on the root pom, the build fails because the
mina
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506490#comment-13506490
]
Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-921:
--
(Deleted old msg since I was testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Cabrera updated DIRMINA-921:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: Running
mvn clean test
at the root works perfectly fine for me. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13506470#comment-13506470
]
Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-921:
--
Running
mvn clean test
at the root w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13096777#comment-13096777
]
Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-858:
--
What Future is this?
> write
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Cabrera resolved DIRMINA-707.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Many thanks.
> Add sendfile support to APR transp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802296#action_12802296
]
Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-758:
--
Hmmm, good point. How does Tomcat test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802290#action_12802290
]
Alan Cabrera commented on DIRMINA-707:
--
On second thought. I think that hasFile
APR code needs unit tests
-
Key: DIRMINA-758
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-758
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Alan Cabrera
The APR code should be unit tested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Cabrera reassigned DIRMINA-707:
Assignee: Alan Cabrera
> Add sendfile support to APR transp
On Mar 1, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 29, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
So, HCF can be optional. If you create HCs directly any cookies
that
are created are scoped w/ that client. The HCF would take an
implementation of a CookieManager
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
AsyncHttpClient was changed w/ the last checkin on 2/26 and now the
build is broken.
I looked at the actual changes. I'm just trying to grok the changes
because I realize that I am new here. It seems that the "old"
AsyncHttpClient is s
18 matches
Mail list logo