On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the >>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? >>> >>> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already >>> has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not use OSGi). >> Are you saying they embed both mina2 and mina3? > > That's something you can face, for instance if one embed ApacheDS (MINA > 2) and MINA 1 in some old library. > > I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we are > taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every one > will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still ... ;-) -0 I think that adding a version to a package name is a bad practice and it's being done to support other bad practices. Plus, there are plenty of tools that allow package renaming when assembling junk drawer uber-jars. Regards, Alan
