[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12625128#action_12625128
]
Mike Heath commented on DIRMINA-614:
If two layer codecs were possible, that's what I
+1
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi community,
After releasing M2 a weird performance regression over M1 was
discovered. More over the tarball was missing number of jars (like
examples, and some other modules) due not updated release.xml
So we think it's time to release M3 a bit more early.
The
Make TextLineDecoder extensible
---
Key: DIRMINA-614
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-614
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M2
Reporter: Mike Heath
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath closed DIRMINA-614.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Make TextLineDecoder extensible
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
releasing 2.0M2.
Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
OPEN :
Vijay T wrote:
hi, i have configured my NioSocketAcceptor class with SSL based...im getting
ClassCastException when writing message to client as String (ie..
iosession.write(str))...
actually SSLFilter expects the message in IoBuffer...
also my SSLFilter is on top, before ProtocolCodecFilter..
Julien Vermillard wrote:
snip
The polled is here because it's base classes for transport
implementations using event strategy based on system calls behaving like
poll() (which can be in fact poll, epoll, kqueue or select depending
of the JVM/OS configuration).
Those class aren't polling in a
I agree with Maarten and Julien, multiple packages may make sense but I
don't see any value to multiple jars at this point.
We had talked about separating IoBuffer and a few other other base
classes that might have utility outside of MINA into their own jar at
one point. I still like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603767#action_12603767
]
Mike Heath commented on DIRMINA-601:
I see a number of difficulties
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
i guys,
while browsing MINA's code, I see @Override used everywhere. I know it
can be helpful when overriding an existing method, but do you think we
need to keep them ?
wdyt ?
Yes. They're very helpful when refactoring.
-Mike
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 14:21:07 +0900, 이희승 (Trustin Lee)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:59:46 +0900, 이희승 (Trustin Lee)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:52:49 +0900, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
이희승
In an IM conversation, Julien pointed me to this JavaWorld article
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2008/jw-03-asynchhttp.html that
discusses asynchronous, non-blocking HTTP. It's by the author of
xsocket (http://xsocket.sourceforge.net/).
He does a good job promoting the benefits of
This is one of the reasons why adding a blocking I/O MINA transport was
on my list of GSoC projects. We need to be able to support blocking I/O
in order to support multicast. Once we do support blocking I/O support
multicast will be trivial. Unfortunately, I only applied for the Async
HTTP
Excellent suggestions. Thanks for the feedback. I've create a wiki
page to track these ideas:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AWEB/Client+Ideas
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proposed new AsyncWeb client API is available here
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
No, you are not late. :)
2008-03-04 (화), 13:27 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
First off, sorry for the LATE response tot his thread. My comments are
below inline.
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Adding commit(Partial)?Response method causes HttpResponse to keep a
response
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Mike Heath wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
snip
This seems like a good idea. I have some questions.
When we cut a release of this code, what version
The proposed new AsyncWeb client API is available here for your viewing
pleasure:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/mheath/asyncweb/client/
I've taken into account a lot of the feedback I've received so far.
Some of the big changes include:
- I've separated the HttpClientFactory and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath resolved DIRMINA-537.
Resolution: Fixed
User mailing list address should be shared on website
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-478:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
GzipFilter
--
Key: DIRMINA-478
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-534:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
AbstractIoSession's getId
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-529:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
use isPrimitive() instead of comparing the string to a list of primitives
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-250:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Provide a test suite for a transport implementor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12576021#action_12576021
]
Mike Heath commented on DIRMINA-128:
Isn't this functionaly already available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-536:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
TextLineDecoder throws an IndexOutOfBoundsException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-535:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Session creation/opened callbacks are not called at logical times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-531:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
IoHandler.sessionClosed not called
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-528:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
NioSocketConnector has a public constructor that takes a package scoped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-515:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
DatagramConnectorTest breaks in XP SP2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath moved DIRMINA-505 to ASYNCWEB-7:
---
Component/s: (was: Protocol - HTTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath closed DIRMINA-461.
--
Resolution: Fixed
There has been no report of TCP stall in MINA so I'm closing this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath moved DIRMINA-496 to ASYNCWEB-8:
---
Component/s: (was: Protocol - HTTP)
Client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-415:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Proxy support
-
Key: DIRMINA-415
suggesting.
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I would also like to see asyncweb make progress as quickly as possible,
and
I'd like to contribute to that effect as well. As Mike pointed out in a
different thread, however
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
snip
This seems like a good idea. I have some questions.
When we cut a release of this code, what version will it be? What will
be its Maven group and artifact id?
What about the other AsyncWeb client? It looks like people are
modifying that quite heavily. Are
Do we have mail archives set up for the user mailing list too? If not,
how would I go about getting that set up?
-Mike
Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:38:17 +0100
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
since the web site now points to the users mailing list, we
First off, sorry for the LATE response tot his thread. My comments are
below inline.
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Adding commit(Partial)?Response method causes HttpResponse to keep a
response to IoSession, which doesn't sound good to me. What do you
think about providing another setContent
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
We have been making a number of changes on the Geronimo sandbox side
for the
AsyncHttpClient. We've been meaning to move them over, but the pent-up
changes have grown to quite a few. I haven't had time to sit down
HttpMethod should not be an enum
Key: ASYNCWEB-6
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-6
Project: Asyncweb
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mike Heath
Currently o.a.a.common.HttpMethod
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I would also like to see asyncweb make progress as quickly as possible, and
I'd like to contribute to that effect as well. As Mike pointed out in a
different thread, however, there are some challenges to this. It's looking
more likely that this is not going to be a simple
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Dave Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I see what you're saying, but that doesn't seem to be how it
works. For example...
(NioProcessor-2) [anonymous] [127.0.0.1] SENT: 331 Guest login okay,
send your complete e-mail address
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
I posted some use cases here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AWEB/ClientUseCases They
still need some refinement to properly convey what I want but they're a
decent start.
I've added some the use cases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on DIRMINA-411 started by Mike Heath.
Create a ChannelWriteFilter
---
Key: DIRMINA-411
URL: https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-411:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Create a ChannelWriteFilter
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M1
Reporter: Mike Heath
Fix For: 2.0.0-M2
FileRegion.setPosition() is poorly named because invoking this method updates
FileRegion.getPosition(), FileRegion.getCount(), and
FileRegion.getWrittenBytes(). I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath resolved DIRMINA-411.
Resolution: Fixed
Create a ChannelWriteFilter
---
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-526:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M1)
2.0.0-M2
Expose getCurrentWriteRequest() via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-518:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M1)
2.0.0-M2
Support gathering writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath reassigned DIRMINA-538:
--
Assignee: Mike Heath
Rename FileRegion.setPosition() to something more descriptive of what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-477:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M1)
2.0.0-M2
Update page about differences
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath updated DIRMINA-514:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Session closing problem on Mac OS X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath resolved DIRMINA-538.
Resolution: Fixed
Rename FileRegion.setPosition() to something more descriptive of what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12573603#action_12573603
]
Mike Heath commented on DIRMINA-537:
I've update the mailing list wiki page to include
Zsolt Fabok wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask you about this page:
http://mina.apache.org/asynchronous-file-io-in-java.html
I'm looking for a JSR203 implementation and the page above says that
it tries to fulfill that java requirements. I've downloaded the latest
stable release of mina
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of MINA 2.0.0-M1.
Apache MINA is a network application framework which helps users develop
high performance and high scalability network applications easily. It
provides an abstract, event-driven, asynchronous API over various
transports
Niklas Therning wrote:
Mike Heath wrote:
I made this fix per your request. You can now use getEnum/putEnum enums
with an ordinal value 127 for bytes and enums with an ordinal value
65535 for shorts.
Wow, it's fascinating how you managed to use shorts for values larger
than 65535
I found a race condition in NioFileRegionTest and it should be fixed
now. Please try and let me know if it works for you.
I'm not sure what's causing the DatagramConnectorTest to fail.
-Mike
Cameron Taggart wrote:
From the latest in subversion, when I do a maven clean install, I
get two test
I made this fix per your request. You can now use getEnum/putEnum enums
with an ordinal value 127 for bytes and enums with an ordinal value
65535 for shorts.
Thanks for the fix.
-Mike
Stuart Scott wrote:
I noticed that the various getEnum/putEnum methods in IoBuffer use the
signed values
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12571218#action_12571218
]
Mike Heath commented on DIRMINA-503:
This test should be fixed now. Please let me
I've suspected for a while that you can getter better performance using
thread-per-connection on Java. I've never actually tested this theory
though. There are certainly a lot of scenarios where you can get lower
latency using thread-per-connection because you don't have the overhead
of queuing.
The vote has been closed and hare are the results.
Binding +1s (7):
Niklas Gustavsson
Mike Heath
Alex Karasulu
Emmanuel Lécharny
Trustin Lee
Niklas Therning
Julien Vermillard
Non-binding +1s (8):
Maarten Bosteels
Frédéric Brégier
Jeff Genender
Brenno Hayden
Edouard De Oliveira
José Henrique
we can do about it.
Also let's make sure we do a good audit of the dependencies along with RAT
runs. We may want to use the maven RAT plugin to automatically do this for
us.
Alex
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote has been closed and hare
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Yes! We're OK to release M1. We should definitely make sure we run RAT.
Excellent! I guess you can disregard the email I sent 5 minutes ago. :)
So I ran RAT and it threw an exception saying it had too many unknown
licenses. Below the RAT output and I'm not sure what it
Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008 4:43 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not matter what Tapestry ships with. I'd like to think the Tapestry
PMC is doing the proper diligence before releases. Regardless we cannot
base our decisions on the interpretation of Apache policy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath reassigned DIRMINA-526:
--
Assignee: Mike Heath
Expose getCurrentWriteRequest() via IoSession
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath reassigned DIRMINA-525:
--
Assignee: Mike Heath
AbstractIoSession.increaseWrittenBytesAndMessages does not update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath resolved DIRMINA-525.
Resolution: Fixed
I've committed this change. Thanks Geoff for the patch
DIRMINA-524 is fixed
DIRMINA-525 is also fixed and I wrote a test for the fix
Thanks for the patches and thanks for following up on these issues.
-Mike
Geoff Cadien wrote:
I opened these issues a couple of weeks ago and was hoping a committer could
have a look at them. Not a huge deal, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath resolved DIRMINA-524.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, thanks Geoff for the patch.
ProtocolCodecFilter should pass FileRegion
Sangjin Lee wrote:
snip
That sounds like a good approach. Still some necessary normalization (like
something I see in DefaultHttpRequest.normalize()) would need to happen in
both cases, no?
normalize() is defined in the MutableHttpRequest interface so in the
case of a mutable request we
Geoff Cadien wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DIRMINA-524 is fixed
DIRMINA-525 is also fixed and I wrote a test for the fix
Thanks for the patches and thanks for following up on these issues.
Mike,
Thanks for getting to those so quickly
I too would love to see a comprehensive test suite for MINA and I like
the direction this thread is headed.
I have been thinking for a couple of months now that using something
like Amazon's EC2 would be a great test bed. (Except that we couldn't
use EC2 to test the serial transport. :( ) It
Mark Webb wrote:
How many machines would we need? Is this something that could be
virtualized?
With Amazon EC2 you create as many instances as you want so it would
give us a great deal of flexibility. Each EC2 instance is virtualized
so you're not getting exclusive access to a machine but
, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
Mike Heath wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
The one feature I like about the AHC client that appears to be missing
here is the higher-level abstraction of an HTTP request. The one
drawback of doing everything with URLs is the requirement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568791#action_12568791
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-4:
---
Is this still an issue in the AsyncWeb common codec
,
authentication challenges, proxy connection, etc. There are times
where a straighforward fetch me this URL mode is sufficient. There
are other situations where that becomes awkward to use.
Rick
Mike Heath wrote:
I posted some use cases here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
, authentication challenges,
proxy connection, etc. There are times where a straighforward fetch me
this URL mode is sufficient. There are other situations where that
becomes awkward to use.
Rick
Mike Heath wrote:
I posted some use cases here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AWEB
One of the problems I've had when promoting MINA is that most Java
developers don't understand the scalability implications of the
thread-per-connection architecture. If I jump right in with how cool
MINA is with its separation of concerns, futures, filters, event
mechanism, simplifies packet
Rick McGuire wrote:
Mike Heath wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
The one feature I like about the AHC client that appears to be missing
here is the higher-level abstraction of an HTTP request. The one
drawback of doing everything with URLs is the requirement that the user
of the client needs
Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:11:47 -0500
이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008-02-11 (월), 20:35 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
[X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
Nice to see you fire the vote, which means another person will get to
know how to deal with the whole release
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
2008-02-12 (화), 11:16 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
Eero Nevalainen wrote:
Btw, what was the status of DNS resolution in MINA? I remember that at
some point DNS resolving used the blocking java API calls. I could
imagine that an asynchronous HTTP-client would have to perform
Mike Heath wrote:
One of the problems I've had when promoting MINA is that most Java
developers don't understand the scalability implications of the
thread-per-connection architecture. If I jump right in with how cool
MINA is with its separation of concerns, futures, filters, event
I posted some use cases here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AWEB/ClientUseCases They
still need some refinement to properly convey what I want but they're a
decent start.
I've also posted a hypothetical AsyncWeb Client API at
http://swamp.homelinux.net/mina/asyncweb/client/api/ with
Hello Community,
It looks like Maarten has resolved DIRMINA-513. I don't see any reason
to hold up a 2.0-M1 release.
There are a multitude of changes in MINA 2.0-M1, too many to enumerate
in a single email. A laundry list of changes going into this release
can be found here
I would have to give Sangjin's arguments a +0. I think he makes some
good points but I don't think I would say that support sub-second
timeouts is _critical_ until people start asking for it.
Load balancing is a case where connect timeouts would be important and
all of the load balancers I've
The new logging features in SLF4J and removing IoSessionLogger were what
was holding up an M1 release. Where do we stand on the logging front
right now?
-Mike
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008 9:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Maarten
Jeff Genender wrote:
David M. Lloyd wrote:
Yes, this is my thinking as well - the casual user wants a simplified API,
while the advanced user wants a more detailed interface.
Certainly no reason not to offer both capabilities ;-)
I totally agree. I think we should offer a very simple
of the points here...
On Jan 29, 2008 2:25 PM, Mike Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Connecting - Connecting is done as a blocking operation. In Jeff
Geneder's AHC branch in the Geronimo sandbox, thread pools are being
used for asynchronous connecting. This is unfortunate since MINA
already has
David M. Lloyd wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
snip
So, I was thinking that you would send requests like so:
ahc.send(url, listener);
This is a departure from the rest of MINA though, in which the idiom
is more like this:
ahc.send(request).setListener(listener); // does not block
To
Alex Karasulu wrote:
snip
IMO I think looking ahead towards the use of MINA 2.0 is the best route here
and it seems that people have already taken care of the merge. Perhaps
there's some emails that you may have missed on the commits@ list and here.
Mike already merged the two I think unless
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
snip
That's a good thought. The reason that the URL was originally put in the
HttpClient constructor (as well as the request) was to allow the
management
of connections to be separated from the URL request. Realistically, a
URL
could be dropped in favor of discrete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-3?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566788#action_12566788
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-3:
---
This will be difficult to verify if the AsyncWeb
It's possible that the server never received the TCP FIN packet and
therefor did not know that it should close the IoSession. There are
situations where a host has no way of knowing that the TCP socket has
closed unless it tries to write data to the socket and that write fails.
This is not a
Merge AHC into AsyncWeb client
--
Key: ASYNCWEB-2
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-2
Project: Asyncweb
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Mike Heath
We need to merge the AHC code in
http
We don't have any any real benchmarks for AsyncWeb yet. At least, I'm
not aware of any extensive benchamrks. I would like to see this change
in the near future. After all, you can't improve performance if you're
not measuring it.
That being said, the Yaws benchmark you sent is contrived and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Heath reassigned ASYNCWEB-2:
-
Assignee: Mike Heath
Merge AHC into AsyncWeb client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565892#action_12565892
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-2:
---
AHC has been merged into AsyncWeb Client as revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565961#action_12565961
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-2:
---
I refactored the AHC code to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566010#action_12566010
]
Mike Heath commented on ASYNCWEB-2:
---
I renamed SessionCache to ConnectionPool since
This past weekend I made a release of the asynchronous database driver
project I've been working on for the past few months. I've been working
on this project as part of my master's thesis.
I call the project Asynchronous Database Connectivity in Java (ADBCJ),
http://adbcj.org/. I've
Rick McGuire wrote:
I had some time this morning, and decided to take a look at this. It
was fairly straightforward merging the changes back in to the 2.0
sandbox branch.
There's a bit of a problem going on here with the jsps used for the
tests. In the 1.1.5-based version, there was no
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
