On 12/14/11 2:17 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
the current implementation of filter's chain is associating this chain to a
service. In MINA 2, each session had a copy of this chain.
IMO, even if the default chain should be associate
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the current implementation of filter's chain is associating this chain to a
> service. In MINA 2, each session had a copy of this chain.
>
> IMO, even if the default chain should be associated to the service, it would
> be a bette
Hi,
the current implementation of filter's chain is associating this chain
to a service. In MINA 2, each session had a copy of this chain.
IMO, even if the default chain should be associated to the service, it
would be a better idea to create a copy of this chain for each created
session.