2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12315514
The staging repo is available at:
On 5 September 2011 10:39, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
Hi,
I think the md5sums do not match
md5sum apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.zip
1e50358e4aadb855e51f91d0bb95db00 *apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.zip
md5sum apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
1bca2f231f455aa8864cd9a5c33125a6 *apache-sshd-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
curl -k
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-028
It now seems to have correct md5.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 15:37, Will
On 5 September 2011 14:58, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-028
It now
Done.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 16:04, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2011 14:58, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh, you're right. I wonder if I hit
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-4347 ...
I've uploaded a new set of artifacts from the same tag at
On 5 September 2011 10:39, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
2nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0.
The legal files have been fixed and empty dirs removed, no other changes.
A number of issues have been fixed:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the optional dependecies, slf4j-api is actually mandatory. Also
slf4j requires one implementation at runtime, so we include
slf4j-simple (though we use slf4j-log4j in the tests). Bouncycastle
and apr are included, because even if they are
On 5 September 2011 16:23, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the optional dependecies, slf4j-api is actually mandatory. Also
So is that a bug in the POM?
slf4j requires one implementation at runtime, so we include
slf4j-simple
No, slf4j-api is mandatory as a a transitive dependency of mina-core
while slf4j-log4j is flagged as test.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 17:35, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2011 16:23, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Cancelling this vote due to the missing AL header.
On the
10 matches
Mail list logo