[Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-21 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Great to see all the Vysper discussions going on. This is going to be a great project! On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > What do you think? I'm leaning towards keeping the code here at MINA, > but doing it as a separate module from Vysper. Since no one has objected, I'l

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-21 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Niklas Gustavsson wrote: [X] +1, Do it -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-21 Thread Michael Jakl
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 23:20, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > To get a final decision on this, let's vote and be done: > [x] +1, Do it

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-21 Thread Ashish
[X] +1, Do it thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-26 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > [X] +1 /niklas

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-26 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > Since no one has objected, I'll propose for the spec compliance code > to be moved to a separate subproject of MINA (at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/speccompliance with Java package > name org.apache.mina.compliance). The vote

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-26 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Would be interesting to get such a code moving to commons... On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > wrote: >> Since no one has objected, I'll propose for the spec compliance code >> to be moved to a separate subproject of

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-26 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Would be interesting to get such a code moving to commons... Yeah, but as discussed earlier in this thread, when I asked over a commons-dev the interest seemed pretty limited (one reply, albeit positive). /niklas

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-26 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: >> Would be interesting to get such a code moving to commons... > > Yeah, but as discussed earlier in this thread, when I asked over a > commons-dev the interest seemed pretty

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-06-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: >> Would be interesting to get such a code moving to commons... > > Yeah, but as discussed earlier in this thread, when I asked over a > commons-dev the interest seemed pretty l

Re: [Vote] Separating the spec compliance stuff

2009-07-21 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > The vote passed with 4 +1 votes. I'll go ahead and break out the code. > We also need to publish it to the snapshot repo so that Vysper (and > other projects can use it). Since we now have a modularized build for Vysper, I broke spec-com