Jacob Tomaw wrote:
Was it the patch from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-25?
yes. I just marked the issue as resolved (forgot to do that lately)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Was it the patch from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASYNCWEB-25?
Thanks,
Jacob
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> FYI, I just migrated to MINA 2.0.0-M4, and fixed some compilation errors.
>
> So far, asyncweb trunk is building now.
>
> --
> - Show quoted text -
>
FYI, I just migrated to MINA 2.0.0-M4, and fixed some compilation errors.
So far, asyncweb trunk is building now.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ditto for me... glad to see folks making use of this. I could help a
bit too, but my bandwidth is also tight.
Glad to see this come up again.
Jeff
Hi guys,
The MINA 2.0 porting was done by Julien AFACS from the svn logs. It's
currently using 2.0.0-M3 version, so it mu
Sangjin and Jeff,
Thanks for the info and background.
I will be sure to read up on the old threads you passed along.
We are currently using the 1.0 AHC in our production environment, but we
have other projects starting to use MINA 2. This is motivating me to build
an AHC on MINA 2. I want to c
Ditto for me... glad to see folks making use of this. I could help a
bit too, but my bandwidth is also tight.
Glad to see this come up again.
Jeff
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
I was one of the people who were involved in bringing AHC over from
the
Geronimo sandbox (wh
I was one of the people who were involved in bringing AHC over from the
Geronimo sandbox (where it was first developed) to under asyncweb.
Originally it was based on mina 1.1.x as at that time mina 2.0 was still in
its active development. We did the bare minimum to make it compile against
mina 2.
Emmanuel,
Your caution is understandable. The only code change for the server is
setting up the MINA LoggingFilter, but clearly there might be changes in
MINA from M3 to M4 that affect the server in an unknown way.
I am very interested in improving AsyncWeb (at least the client portion).
My comp
Jacob Tomaw wrote:
I see that this is happening because the client is not completely moved from
the ahc structure to the asyncweb.client structure. It is also not using
the common codec.
I am prepared to open jiras and create patches to clean this up. However, I
want to gauge the likelihood of
I see that this is happening because the client is not completely moved from
the ahc structure to the asyncweb.client structure. It is also not using
the common codec.
I am prepared to open jiras and create patches to clean this up. However, I
want to gauge the likelihood of these patches being
Hi,
When i package the jars from the trunk of async web I do not get all of the
classes. For instance, in client only org.apache.asyncweb.client is
exported. I was also expecting the classes from client in the package
org.apache.ahc to be jared up.
Before I dig into maven to understand why this
11 matches
Mail list logo
