Hi guys,
is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *always* fail when we commit
some new code, and one hour later come back with again 6 useless mails
telling us that "Hey, sorry, I was totally f*cked up last time I sent
you 6 mails" ?
If Hudson can't inform us when there are *real* errors,
It may be worth looking into whether we can use Bamboo which is much
better at CI. Its an atlassian project and I think it falls under the
usual free open source license.
Jeff
On Feb 20, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *alway
I got Hudson running @work without a trouble for a year.
Look like ASF one is overload or something like that..
If infra got bamboo or continuum or anything else installed in a stable
way I'm +1 for moving.
Le Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:04:30 -0700,
Jeff Genender a écrit :
> It may be worth looking int
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *always* fail when we commit some
> new code, and one hour later come back with again 6 useless mails telling us
> that "Hey, sorry, I was totally f*cked up last time I sent you 6 mails" ?
I do
Ok, guys,
sorry for my overreaction...
Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
If we look at the build history, we see that we don't have that many
failures. The problem is that those failures seems to be time-dependent.
The JDK 1.6/Windows build are also in constant failure, a
What I want to say is : get this bloddy 2.0 out, and let's bury it. It's
dead code, it's a cancer we can't fix. Any time we spend on it is a
waste, and slow down our work on MINA 3.0.
We have some issues like DIRMINA-764, but it can be worked around on the
client side, and can't be fixed on the
Sounds like you are pissed now, try to breath ;)
I'm agree for releasing 2.0 now.
Julien
Le Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:53:28 +0100,
Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
> Ok, guys,
>
> sorry for my overreaction...
>
> Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
>
> If we look at the build histor
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Sounds like you are pissed now, try to breath ;)
> I'm agree for releasing 2.0 now.
+1
/niklas
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Ok, guys,
>
> sorry for my overreaction...
>
> Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
>
> If we look at the build history, we see that we don't have that many
> failures. The problem is that those failures seems to be time
