Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

Le 19/03/2018 à 18:20, Lyor Goldstein a écrit : > Thanks a lot Emmanuel... > > As far as the build failure it is strange indeed as it passes on both my > Windows and Linux machines. However, since it states: > > [INFO] Rat check: Summary over all files. Unapproved: 2 > > it means that the

Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

Thanks a lot Emmanuel... As far as the build failure it is strange indeed as it passes on both my Windows and Linux machines. However, since it states: [INFO] Rat check: Summary over all files. Unapproved: 2 it means that the offending files are listed in the target/rat.txt file (or somewhere

Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

Hi Lyor, Le 18/03/2018 à 19:26, Lyor Goldstein a écrit : > Looks interesting is there a guide as to how to register a project (I was > thinking about SSHD...) I have created the config for SSHD. The result can be found here: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=MINA_SSHD Now, the

Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

Looks interesting is there a guide as to how to register a project (I was thinking about SSHD...) >> Hi guys, >> I have registred MINA on the SonarQube server we have at Apache. The result can be seen here : >> https://builds.apache.org/analysis/component_measures/?id=MINA >> It gets generated

MINA SonarQube analysis

Hi guys, I have registred MINA on the SonarQube server we have at Apache. The result can be seen here : https://builds.apache.org/analysis/component_measures/?id=MINA It gets generated every time a build is launched, ie, when a commit is pushed. -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com

Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

Le 06/03/2018 à 18:20, Jonathan Valliere a écrit : > So many warnings…  Yes... There are a few puzzling ones, like the synchronized( buf ) where buf is a parameter... I think we should focus on blockers and critical level issues atm. -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org

Re: MINA SonarQube analysis

So many warnings…  On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just ran Sonarqube analysis on the current 2.0.17 branch, and there > are a few things we might want to fix. > > Please have a look at >

MINA SonarQube analysis

Hi guys, I just ran Sonarqube analysis on the current 2.0.17 branch, and there are a few things we might want to fix. Please have a look at https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.mina%3Amina-parent%3A2=false Thanks ! -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org