Re: Multi-thread/single-session and multi-thread/multi-session, which performances better?

2007-12-07 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hi Qi, Just out of curiousity, why is the client needing 2500+ threads ? Is that 2500+ threads in a single JVM ? I doubt that will be efficient, unless you are running it on a machine with 500 cores :-) Let us know how it turns out. Maarten On Dec 7, 2007 3:06 AM, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Multi-thread/single-session and multi-thread/multi-session, which performances better?

2007-12-06 Thread Qi
://www.nabble.com/Multi-thread-single-session-and-multi-thread-multi-session%2C-which-performances-better--tf4953785s16868.html#a14203520 Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Multi-thread/single-session and multi-thread/multi-session, which performances better?

2007-12-06 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Qi, On Dec 7, 2007 8:31 AM, Qi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Trustin, Thank you for your quick reply. Sorry I think I didn't make myself clear, I was intend to ask which model is better for the client side. Since the clients are going to run many threads, will that cause performance

Multi-thread/single-session and multi-thread/multi-session, which performances better?

2007-12-05 Thread Qi
-thread-multi-session%2C-which-performances-better--tf4953785s16868.html#a14185627 Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Multi-thread/single-session and multi-thread/multi-session, which performances better?

2007-12-05 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Qi, On Dec 6, 2007 12:17 PM, Qi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I'm looking to write a client-server application which has a multi-threaded client (2500+ threads per client). Each thread needs to send and receive messages with the server, though the sending frequency is pretty low(2-3