Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi guys,
2.0.0-M2 release is suffering some serious issues :
- DIRMINA-609 a big perf regression on big message (quite common)
- the tarballs are fubared, you miss half of the modules
I tihkn we need to redo a release soon (M3), specially for DIRMINA-609
WDYT ?
+1.
+1 to releasing. Do we really have to cut down the 72 hrs? Might want to
give some time for people to test it?
Alex
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Julien Vermillard wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> 2.0.0-M2 release is suffering some serious issues :
>>
yep, and me to gather time and fix the distribution :)
Julien
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:47:04 -0400
"Alex Karasulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to releasing. Do we really have to cut down the 72 hrs? Might
> want to give some time for people to test it?
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5
I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good idea
in my experience.
I haven't yet gotten around to finishing up on DIRMINA-608, but I see
no problems pushing that to M4.
Barend
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Julien Vermillard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep, and me to
+1 Sounds fine with me. I am still working on the composite buffer support,
but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release right away.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, W.B. Garvelink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good ide
gt;
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lundi, 28 Juillet 2008, 23h28mn 49s
Objet : Re: releasing 2.0.0-M3 quickly
+1 Sounds fine with me. I am still working on the composite buffer support,
but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release right away.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, W.B
le : Lundi, 28 Juillet 2008, 23h28mn 49s
> Objet : Re: releasing 2.0.0-M3 quickly
>
> +1 Sounds fine with me. I am still working on the composite buffer
> support, but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release
> right away.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008
