Le Fri Nov 07 2014 at 07:57:09, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 07/11/14 07:30, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Le Fri Nov 07 2014 at 1:42:43 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
a
écrit :
Le 06/11/14 23:15, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Hello,
upon Emmanuel's request, I
Le 07/11/14 12:06, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Le Fri Nov 07 2014 at 07:57:09, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a
écrit :
I'm just stating the fact that when future were introduced, we weren't
using generic yet, because we wanted to keep the 1.4 compatibility. When
we decided to switch to
Hello,
upon Emmanuel's request, I reviewed the fix for DIRMINA-994
(commit f1972fc3de8c4074ff7b60f8c557d3c53013e30b). Here are my remarks:
- the Future framework in MINA2 is not linked in any form to JDK's
Future, is there any reason for that ? I've seen that IOFuture in MINA3
extends
Le 06/11/14 23:15, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Hello,
upon Emmanuel's request, I reviewed the fix for DIRMINA-994
(commit f1972fc3de8c4074ff7b60f8c557d3c53013e30b). Here are my remarks:
- the Future framework in MINA2 is not linked in any form to JDK's
Future, is there any reason for that ?
Le Fri Nov 07 2014 at 1:42:43 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 06/11/14 23:15, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Hello,
upon Emmanuel's request, I reviewed the fix for DIRMINA-994
(commit f1972fc3de8c4074ff7b60f8c557d3c53013e30b). Here are my remarks:
- the Future
Le 07/11/14 07:30, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Le Fri Nov 07 2014 at 1:42:43 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 06/11/14 23:15, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
Hello,
upon Emmanuel's request, I reviewed the fix for DIRMINA-994
(commit f1972fc3de8c4074ff7b60f8c557d3c53013e30b). Here are
