Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.2 : reminder

+1 Jeff On Dec 13, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi guys, it was probably a bad idea to cut a release candidate on friday evening :) This is just a reminder that a new vote has been launched last week, that is supposed to run until tomorrow evening. I'm extending it so

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.3

+1 Jeff On Apr 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: This is a bug fix release. The most important issue was the 100% CPU issue : we have removed the workaround in 2.0.1, and it seems that it was a wrong move. The workaround has been added back. The fixed issues are :

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.3, take 2

+1 Jeff On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Ok I restart a new vote for MINA 2.0.3. The two following bugs have been fixed since the last vote : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-811 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-827 Bugs * [DIRMINA-627

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.4 (round 2..)

+1 Jeff On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ! After the cancellation of the last vote, a new attempt to release MINA 2.0.4 This is a bug fix release. Fixed issues :

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.6.0

+1 Jeff On Sep 2, 2011, at 3:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: A vote for this long overdue release of SSHD 0.6.0 which contains a bunch of improvements and bug fixes. A number of issues have been fixed:

Re: [VOTE] Release Mina SSHD 0.6.0 (3rd try)

+1 Jeff On Sep 5, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: 3nd try for the release of SSHD 0.6.0. I've fixed the missing header and removed the duplicate source distribution from the staging repo. A number of issues have been fixed:

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.5, take 2

+1 Jeff On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: +1 - nonbinding Regards, Alan On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: Hi ! This is the second attempt to release new version of MINA. This is a bug fix release, we tried to clean a lot of pending issues.

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.7 Release

+1 Jeff On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ! as the latest release (2.0.6) contained two blocking bugs (a SSL regression introduced in 2.0.5 and another regression in the UDP connector/acceptor intruduced in 2.0.6), a new release has been

Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M1 take 3

+1 Jeff On Jul 19, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, we need at least one more binding vote... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 0.9.0

+1 Jeff On Jul 23, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm starting a vote to release the 0.9.0 version of SSHD. Release notes are at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12323301 Staging repository is at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 0.10.0

+1 Jeff On Feb 10, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: Vote to release the 0.10.0 version of SSHD Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12324784 Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.10.0 (2nd cut)

+1 Jeff On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for me. Good work ! Le 2/18/14 8:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : +1 2014-02-13 13:42 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: Vote to release the 0.10.0 version of SSHD Release

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.10.1

+1 Jeff On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: Vote to release the 0.10.1 version of SSHD Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310849version=12326289 Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 0.12.0

+1 Jeff On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: +1 2014-07-09 11:03 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: Vote to release the 0.12.0 version of SSHD Release notes:

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.8

+1 Jeff On Sep 18, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Mondain mond...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for sure! On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jeff MAURY jeffma...@jeffmaury.com wrote: +1 Ran the build, plus Apache Camel and Google Gerrit builds modified to use 2.0.8 Jeff On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:01 PM,

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.9

+1 Jeff On Oct 18, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi fellow developers ! we were able to cut a new release one month after 2.0.8. It's a bug fix release, with very few fixes, but expected ones. This release was also a good opportunity to fix the

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.9 release (take 2)

+1 Jeff On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi fellow developers ! we were able to cut a new release one month after 2.0.8. It's a bug fix release, with very few fixes, but expected ones. This release was also a good opportunity to fix the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 0.13.0

+1 Jeff On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: Can we have a few other pairs of eyes to review this release please ? We're still missing binding votes. 2014-10-21 11:28 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I'd like to call a vote on releasing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 0.14.0

+1 Jeff On Mar 6, 2015, at 12:11 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: +1 2015-03-03 17:38 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I'd like to call a vote on releasing Apache SSHD 0.14.0 Staging repo at

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 1.0.0 (2nd try)

+1 Jeff On Aug 19, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: I uploaded another 1.0.0 release of SSHD to fix the JDK7 compatibility problems. The artefacts are available at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1014 Release notes:

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 1.1.0

+1 Jeff > On Jan 15, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I uploaded a 1.1.0 release of SSHD. > The artefacts are available at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1016 > > Release notes: > >

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.13 release

+1 Jeff > On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Jeff MAURY wrote: > > +1 > > Jeff > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> MINA 2.0.13 is a release that fixes a serious bug in the SslHandler that >> was causing a

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release

+1 Jeff > On Jan 31, 2016, at 12:27 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > Tjis release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. > It also

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Jeff > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. > It

Re: MINA 2.0.12

+1 Jeff > On Jan 30, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi guys, > > we just have released MINA 2.0.1 (still to be announced) and Radovan > just found a hug bug in the way we deal with closed session. This is > related to DIRMINA-1001 and DIRMINA-1006. All in

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.11 release

+1 Jeff > On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.11. > > This mainly fixes a bug in the SslHandler, which might cause a loop in some > corner cases. > > The Javadoc has also be improved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 1.1.1

+1 Jeff > On Mar 9, 2016, at 3:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a release candidate for SSHD 1.1.1 > > Repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1022 > > Release notes: > >

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.14 release

+1 Jeff > On Aug 25, 2016, at 8:16 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a new release, MINA 2.0.14. It fixes many issues, some of them being > a real burden for SSHD DIRMINA-1021). Some patches were also applied (thanks > to Maria Petridan). > > Here are

Re: [VOTE] Release SSHD 1.3.0

+1 Jeff > On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:27 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've prepared a candidate for SSHD 1.3.0 release at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1024 > > Please review and vote. > >

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.15 release

+1 Jeff > On Sep 21, 2016, at 1:11 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a new release, MINA 2.0.15. It fixes one critical SSL issue, and a > NPE. Javadoc has also been a bit cleaned up. > > Here are the fixed issues : > > Bugs : > -- > > [DIRMINA-1044

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mina SSHD 1.6.0

+1 Jeff > On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a release for SSHD 1.6.0 at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1031 > > I've moved issues targeted to 1.5.0 to 1.6.0, so we have the overall > following changes:

Re: [VOTE] Release Mina SSHD 2.0.0

+1 Jeff > On Jun 11, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > We're still having only 2 votes on this thread. Could a few people have a > look so that we can get it out or fix any problem ? > > 2018-05-28 17:12 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet : > >> I've staged a release of Mina SSHD 2.0.0 >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mina 2.0.19

+! Jeff > On Jun 7, 2018, at 3:24 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.0.19 release. > > This is a fix for the previous release (2.0.18) which broke the API by > mistake. > > Two changes have been rolled back : > > - the 'event' message has been

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.0.18

+1 Jeff > On May 29, 2018, at 7:48 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.0.18 release. There is nothing > critical in it, no big bug fixes, just a few annoying ones. Although > there is some important addition: The IoHandler interface now expose a

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.0.17

I thought I voted for this… but if not… +1 Jeff > On Mar 10, 2018, at 11:23 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi guys, > > please don't forget to spend 5 minutes to review and vote this release ! > > Many thanks ! > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.0.17

+1 Jeff > On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:09 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is the list of fixed issues : > > Bugs : > -- > >[DIRMINA-844] - Http Proxy Authentication failed to complete (see > description for exact point of failure) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.0.20 release

+1 Jeff > On Feb 21, 2019, at 4:06 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.0.20 release. > > It's a bug fix release. Here are the list of bugs that have been fixed : > > DIRMINA-1092: Removed a spurious printstacktrace > DIRMINA-1098:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.1.0

+1 Jeff > On Mar 4, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.0 release. > > It's a branched version diverging from Apache MINA 2.0.17, with some > difference in the API. Otherwise, every changes made in 2.0.18/19/20 have > been

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.2.0

+1 Jeff > On Feb 4, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a SSHD 2.2.0 release for review: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1039 > > The tag is available at: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.2.0 > The distributions are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Miba 2.1.3

+1 Jeff > On May 29, 2019, at 7:19 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.3 release. > > This fixes a few issues that were found since the last release, mainly a 100% > CPU peak caused by some changes in the way we process the messageSent() >

Re: Call to Vote on Branch Name Changes

Put a "[VOTE]" on the beginning of the subject line so it gets people’s attention better. This thread looks more like a discussion than a vote. But if it is a vote... +1 Jeff > On May 1, 2019, at 6:06 AM, Jonathan Valliere wrote: > > Is that it? Just two votes? > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019

Re: One more vote, was : [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.1.2

You have 3 if you count yourself. Jonathon, me, and you. Did you want one more beyond 3? Jeff > On Apr 19, 2019, at 3:06 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > I would need one more vote for this release to be out ! I'm leaving for a > week vacation tomorrow morning, so it's a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.1.2

+1 Jeff > On Apr 17, 2019, at 6:48 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.2 release. > > It's a bug fix release following last week SSL fix (MINA 2.1.1): the > WriteFuture was not notified that the message was fully sent, leading to a > stalling

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Move mina.a.o from CMS/svn to Hugo/git

Hey Emanuell, I missed the vote… but I am +1 too… Jeff > On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:41 AM, Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Thanks Emmanuel! Requesting repositories is selfservice, so indeed they will > be available pretty > quick :) > > I have everything available in my copy of the mina-site

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.4.0

Did I miss this? +1 from me. Jeff > On Jan 26, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I think we're still missing a binding vote..., we need at least 3. > > Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 09:02, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > >> I've staged a release candidate: >> * Repo: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.1.4

+1 Jeff > On Aug 17, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.4 release. > > It fixes the following issues : > > > Bugs > > [DIRMINA-966] - NIO Datagram messages can get duplicated when unable to > be sent by the underlying

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.5.0

+1 Jeff > On Jun 18, 2020, at 1:35 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > My +1 > > - built from git and from packages > > - signature checked > > > I insist that the packages should be pushed into > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/ with SHA256 and SHA512 > signatures, as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.5.1

+1 Jeff > On Jun 26, 2020, at 3:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a release candidate: > * Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1050 > * Distributions: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.5.1/ > * Git Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.7.0 (2nd try)

+1 Jeff > On May 11, 2021, at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged another release candidate built on JDK 1.8: > * maven repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1057 > * Distributions: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.7.0/ > *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.7.0 (2nd try)

+1 Jeff > On May 28, 2021, at 12:27 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > My +1 with your key :-) > > On 28/05/2021 08:17, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> I think we're still missing some votes... >> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 16:21, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : >>> I've staged another release candidate built

Re: [VOTE] Mina SSHD 2.8.0

+1 Jeff > On Nov 30, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a release candidate at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1061 > GIt Tag: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.8.0 > Issues solved: > >

Re: Vote needed: [VOTE] Apache FtpServer 1.1.3 release

Did i not vote? +1 if not. Jeff > On Feb 22, 2022, at 11:06 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > I need at least one more vote for this release... > > Thanks ! > > On 20/02/2022 09:48, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> Hi, >> This is a bug fix release. This version uses the latest MINA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.0.23

+1 Jeff > On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:03 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a maintenance release for MINA 2.0. > > It contains many backported issues from the 2.1 and 2.2 branches. > > A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not > approved): > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache FtpServer 1.1.3 release

+1 Jeff > On Feb 20, 2022, at 3:03 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > some links were wrog (damn copy/paste...) > > The distributions are available (with signatures) for download on > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/ftpserver/1.1.3/ > > and all final artifacts are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 2.1.6

+1 Jeff > On Feb 6, 2022, at 1:18 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a bug fix release for MINA. > > Here is the list of fixed issues : > > > * [DIRMINA-1152] IoServiceStatistics introduces huge latencies > * [DIRMINA-1156]Inconsistent worker / idleWorker in >

Re: [Vote] MINA 2.2.0 release

+1 Jeff > On Jul 4, 2022, at 3:43 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi! > > > it has been a couple of months now that I cut a version of MINA 2.2.0, but > haven't started a vote, because I wanted to test that exception were properly > handled when generated from the SslFilter. It took may

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.9.0

+1 Jeff > On Jul 11, 2022, at 7:34 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a candidate release at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1071 > Git tag: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0 > Issues solved: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.1 release

+1 Jeff > On Jul 20, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > hi! > > > This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1. > > This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a > missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that leverage > OSGi, due to a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.9.0 (2nd try)

+1 Jeff > On Jul 18, 2022, at 1:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged another candidate release at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076 > Git tag: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0 > Issues solved: >

Re: [Vote] MINA 2.2.0 release

I dont remember if I voted or not…but if not… here it is… Jeff > On Jul 16, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > > > On 16/07/2022 11:31, Christoph John wrote: >> +1 > > Thanks! > >> But don't know if my vote counts. > > Every vote *do* count, even if not all the votes are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.9.1

+1 Jeff > On Aug 22, 2022, at 6:46 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.1 at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1079 > Git tag: > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.1 > Issues solved: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.2, 2.1.7, 2.0.24 releases

Errr…. +1 to all 3. :-) Jeff > On Jun 1, 2023, at 8:21 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > > +1 > > Jeff > >> On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >> hi! >> >> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast! >> >> >> Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.2, 2.1.7, 2.0.24 releases

+1 Jeff > On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > hi! > > WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast! > > > This is a vote for a triple release: > * MINA 2.2.2 > * MINA 2.1.7 > * MINA 2.0.24 > > Those versions are fixing some SSL/TLS issues and bring some added features: >

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-433) Http codec needs to properly handle the Host header

Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M1 Reporter: Jeff Genender Fix For: 2.0.0-M1 Via the Http spec, the HTTP/1.1 spec needs to have a Host line. Currently the code in the HttpRequestEncoder is not testing for default ports or the -1 for a port that is a default for a port not set

[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-433) Http codec needs to properly handle the Host header

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender updated DIRMINA-433: -- Attachment: DIRMINA-433.jgenender.patch Http codec needs to properly handle the Host header

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-434) Cookies need to handle domain

Reporter: Jeff Genender Fix For: 2.0.0-M1 Attachments: DIRMINA-434.jgenender.patch The cookie handler currently does not handle the domain. Patch attached. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-434) Cookies need to handle domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender updated DIRMINA-434: -- Attachment: DIRMINA-434.jgenender.patch Cookies need to handle domain

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-441) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v1.1.2)

Affects Versions: 1.1.2 Reporter: Jeff Genender Fix For: 1.1.3 The SocketConnection cannot be closed. Currently it will wait a certain amount of timeout as specified by the worker timeout to shut down the connection. This can result in OOM and hanging clients

[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-441) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v1.1.2)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender updated DIRMINA-441: -- Attachment: DIRMINA-441-jgenender.patch SocketConnection cannot be manually closed

[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-441) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v1.1.2)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender updated DIRMINA-441: -- Attachment: DIRMINA-441-jgenender.patch This patch is better and its thread safe

[jira] Created: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M1 Reporter: Jeff Genender Fix For: 2.0.0-M1 The SocketConnection cannot be closed. Currently it will wait a certain amount of timeout as specified by the worker timeout to shut down the connection. This can result in OOM and hanging clients

[jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender updated DIRMINA-443: -- Attachment: DIRMINA-443-jgenender.patch Patch attached allows SocketConnector to be closed

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530704 ] Jeff Genender commented on DIRMINA-443: --- How would it lead to an abnormal termination? The Worker threads

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530736 ] Jeff Genender commented on DIRMINA-443: --- Well...the close() is shutting everything down, so we really don't

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530743 ] Jeff Genender commented on DIRMINA-443: --- Ok...I see the code for the timeout and thus the differences...sorry

[jira] Closed: (DIRMINA-441) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v1.1.2)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender closed DIRMINA-441. - Resolution: Fixed Agreed...will close it out. SocketConnection cannot be manually closed

[jira] Closed: (DIRMINA-443) SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Genender closed DIRMINA-443. - Wow...that was fast! ;-) Confirmed. SocketConnection cannot be manually closed (for v2.X

<    1   2