RE: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-05 Thread Robert Scholte
0 > From: che...@codelutin.com > To: > CC: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:22:40 + > Robert Scholte wrote: > > > > > You have karma for http://bamboo.ci.codehaus.org/br

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-05 Thread chemit
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:22:40 + Robert Scholte wrote: > > You have karma for http://bamboo.ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO > Hy Robert, In order to make its works on this plugin could I have also karma on it. I need to have a look of the its build.log files (hope this is possible ?). Thanks.

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-04 Thread chemit
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600 Paul Gier wrote: > I did some updates to the site docs today, including copying some of > the info from the Code Lutin site, and adding/rewriting other stuff. > Tony, maybe you can add the French version of the site? > yes I can try this. > Also, is there any

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-04 Thread Paul Gier
I did some updates to the site docs today, including copying some of the info from the Code Lutin site, and adding/rewriting other stuff. Tony, maybe you can add the French version of the site? Also, is there any problem if I remove the @since tags? Since they won't make sense if we restart the

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-04 Thread Paul Gier
of this project. > > -Robert > >> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:19 +0100 >> From: che...@codelutin.com >> To: >> CC: dev@mojo.codehaus.org >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and > maven-license-plugin >> >> On Wed, 02 Feb 2

RE: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-03 Thread Robert Scholte
I've adjusted the notifications a bit, don't think the complete dev-list needs to be informed of the Bamboo status of this project. -Robert > Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:19 +0100 > From: che...@codelutin.com > To: > CC: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-de

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-03 Thread chemit
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:07:46 -0600 Paul Gier wrote: > On 02/02/2011 01:22 AM, chemit wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:40:52 -0600 > > Paul Gier wrote: > > > >> Tony, > >> > >> What do you think about changing the unit tests which currently use > >> the maven plugin test harness to be additiona

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-02 Thread Paul Gier
On 02/02/2011 01:22 AM, chemit wrote: > On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:40:52 -0600 > Paul Gier wrote: > >> Tony, >> >> What do you think about changing the unit tests which currently use >> the maven plugin test harness to be additional ITs called by the >> invoker plugin? It seems that the plugin test

RE: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-02 Thread Robert Scholte
@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:40:52 -0600 > Paul Gier wrote: > > > Tony, > > > > What do you think about changing the unit tests which currently use > > the m

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-01 Thread chemit
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:40:52 -0600 Paul Gier wrote: > Tony, > > What do you think about changing the unit tests which currently use > the maven plugin test harness to be additional ITs called by the > invoker plugin? It seems that the plugin test harness is not actively > maintained anymore, an

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-02-01 Thread Paul Gier
Tony, What do you think about changing the unit tests which currently use the maven plugin test harness to be additional ITs called by the invoker plugin? It seems that the plugin test harness is not actively maintained anymore, and these unit tests currently depend on the maven helper plugin tes

RE: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-01-29 Thread Robert Scholte
24 +0100 > From: che...@codelutin.com > CC: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:17:42 -0600 > Paul Gier wrote: > > > The nuiton maven-license-plugin [1] has been imported to co

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-01-28 Thread chemit
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:17:42 -0600 Paul Gier wrote: > The nuiton maven-license-plugin [1] has been imported to codehaus svn > and partially merged with the existing codehaus license-maven-plugin. > Here are some notes about what needs to be done before the first > release: > > - Add a bit more s

Re: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-01-28 Thread Paul Gier
Thanks Robert, I was able to log in and create a plan for the license plugin. But the site seems unbearably slow for me, I'm not able to build the new plan, is this normal? On 01/27/2011 03:22 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > You have karma for http://bamboo.ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO > > -Robert >

RE: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin

2011-01-27 Thread Robert Scholte
You have karma for http://bamboo.ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO -Robert > Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:17:42 -0600 > From: pg...@redhat.com > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: [mojo-dev] Merge of license-maven-plugin and maven-license-plugin > > The nuiton maven-license-plugin [1] has been impor