+1
I also suggest add reviewer list link to the PR template, so that
developers can easily request review from those reviewers.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:30 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> I was suggesting something more concrete:
>
> - Add a Reviewers section to
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mx
this suggestion looks like it is putting the onus on contributors to
collaborate with contributors outside their org to get nominated to be
committer or a PMC of this project.
Every organization has its own business goals, on the way to meet their
objectives if their employees happen to be great co
I was suggesting something more concrete:
- Add a Reviewers section to
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md to
list a list of Reviewers.
- This is a "pesudo role", but holds weight as committers should highly
value their reviews during the PR process.
- The com
>
> Many potential committers and
> PMC won’t interact with the non-Amazonians at all (since there are so few),
> so they’d be relegated to obscurity and hopelessness by default.
>
If potential contributors do not comes from Amazon, then the Amazonian PMC
can nominate them :) If the potential co
I am ok with this current doc. The other doc, I forget where it is, has a
list something like “things that will make you a committerpushing a
release out” (or something like that). Which isn’t really the case, since
lots of people who have led a release aren’t committers yet.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2
-1
There’s too few non-Amazonians for this to be fair IMHO. While I am in
strong favor of more non-Amazonians being part of the community, making a
rule (or guideline) like this would put a very small group of people in
control of the PMC. In addition, that “day job” line is a bit gray in
areas,
+1
With the release announcement for MXNet 1.3 all contributors incl. code
reviewers have been recognized. I suggest all future release announcements
should include such recognition. Are you suggesting to highlight most
active reviewers in release announcement or regularly (e.g. monthly),
specifica
Hi Tianqi -
+1 . I like the idea to grow diversity at the project and encourage
communication beyond people sitting next to each other. I also support the
way you described as guideline, not has a hard rule. I think it is
important we focus on merit and contributions when evaluating nominee for
com
Dear MXNet Community:
There has been a great discussion going on in terms of
PMC/Committer Criteria. As a community move forward, it is important to
make the community inclusive to everyone and encourage folks to work
together.
I want to propose the following proposal courtesy: when a PMC propos
Also re another email-thread(I sent out one with my institutional email
which get blocked initially, so this one was a bit duplication of that). I
think it should really be the job of committers to recognize potential
reviewers, github also makes it easier to do so, e.g.
https://github.com/apache/i
10 matches
Mail list logo
