Re: Discussion Forums?

is open source so we can host it on Apache infrastructure and include it on our site. I will suggest PonyMail on the original thread and see what the community thinks. Thanks for your feedback Chris. Seb On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: Hi, I

Re: Discussion Forums?

elines wrt forums? Any guidance is appreciated. Thanks! -Seb Kiureghian On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > What’s wrong with lists.apache.org as a forum? > > Cheers, > Chris >

Re: Discussion Forums?

What’s wrong with lists.apache.org as a forum? Cheers, Chris On 9/15/17, 9:26 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote: The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a discussion forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been Incubator

Re: MXNet project web page

Check out this guide that shows how to conform to the Apache website policies: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#introduction Cheers, Chris On 8/4/17, 11:20 AM, "Ly Nguyen" wrote: Hi Isabelle, As Mu mentioned we are in the process of transferring

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Hi Hen, Why not explore the use of Apache Artemis as an alternative? Cheers, Chris On 7/5/17, 11:23 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote: One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies.

Re: New Apache MXNet content

Dear Cynthya, Thanks for reaching out to the list. I think it’s important for the community here at the ASF to make sure that as you are publishing those blogs/posts/tutorials and so forth that they are in coordination with the Apache Press/Marketing guidelines and that they respect the