Hi All,
The next RC is out on http://svn.apache.org/builds/myfaces/release
Please test, don't use in production environments, don't use if you
don't have time to experience bugs, etc, etc etc.
Thanks for testing!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
Virtuas - www.virtuas.com
EiC Eclipse Developer Journal - e
Good point!
Adam at his best - refreshing as always ;)
regards,
Martin
On 10/5/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The single lamest thing is that the JSF spec doesn't explicitly say what
> methods should be supported.
>
> The second lamest thing is that the spec doesn't require that *a
Please open this as an improvement jira-issue!
regards,
MartinOn 10/5/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple of suggested improvements for the patch:- Perform the
encoding check once, in the constructor, and save a boolean instance
variable, to save lots of unnecessary String.equals()
My 0,02:
I prefer the semi-automatic way, i.e. beautify on demand for marked text only.
There are always lines, that are better readable if formatted by hand.
Although there are editors that are able to format code in a nearly
perfect way [ IntelliJ! :-) ], they cannot beat human capabilities.
Not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-630?page=comments#action_12331359
]
Thomas Timbul commented on MYFACES-630:
---
Please note that if only the api jar is placed in the container, the problem
does not occur, but it means that myfaces-impl.ja
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-224?page=comments#action_12331360
]
Mathias Broekelmann commented on MYFACES-224:
-
Please post the jsp/bean code which produces it.
> x:dataTable, x:columns and x:commandSortHeader not sorting the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-630?page=all ]
Martin Marinschek closed MYFACES-630:
-
Fix Version: Nightly
Resolution: Fixed
Should be fixed now.
> StartupServletContextListener should ignore missing web.xml
> --
StartupServletContextListener crashes if all jars placed in webapp
--
Key: MYFACES-665
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-665
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Implementation
Env
Hello,
I would like to know if I was deleting nodes correctly in the tree.
I get the tree :
*
FacesContext facesContext = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
ht = (HtmlTree) facesContext.getViewRoot()
.findComponent(":validationForm:validation-tr
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-547?page=comments#action_12331363
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-547:
---
Fixed your last comment. Still wondering about the reasons for the other
problems ;)
regards,
Martin
> Firefox fail
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-665?page=comments#action_12331364
]
Thomas Timbul commented on MYFACES-665:
---
Removing Springs variableresolver OR placing spring.jar in the webapp instead
of the container fixes the problem.
I will post
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-428?page=all ]
Martin Marinschek closed MYFACES-428:
-
Fix Version: Nightly
Resolution: Fixed
thanks to Sharath Reddy for his patch
> InputDate(s) within dataTable submitting incorrect dates
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-665?page=comments#action_12331366
]
Thomas Timbul commented on MYFACES-665:
---
please see http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-1348
> StartupServletContextListener crashes if all jar
generated form action should include existing query string if posting to same
view
--
Key: MYFACES-666
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-666
Project: MyFaces
Type: Improv
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-666?page=comments#action_12331368
]
Thomas Timbul commented on MYFACES-666:
---
please lower the priority.
It is possible to circumvent by passing the required parameters as
. The developer should know whic
Sorry to comment outside of jira to this...
I had similar issues with jsf-spring in the past and the order
of the filters in the web.xml did the trick for me in that particular case.
You might have a similar issue (I do not know the spring internal jsf
binding variable resolvers too much since I h
Martin,
Is encrypting the client-side state a JSF 1.2 requirement? I seem to
recall seeing it in the new spec ... I remember bringing that issue up
a long time ago on this list or the Sun forum. Nice to see that its
being implemented.
I have a few ideas on that but not time at the moment. :-(
But you would agree that we should not have tabs right? If your
editor is set to convert tabs to spaces we can semi-automate the
correction of this as you are suggesting.
sean
On 10/5/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My 0,02:
> I prefer the semi-automatic way, i.e. beautify on dem
Nonstandard validation/conversion behavior of
Key: MYFACES-667
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-667
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Tomahawk
Versions: 1.1.0
Reporte
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-667?page=comments#action_12331387
]
sean schofield commented on MYFACES-667:
[Offlist email from Bill Dudney]
On page 3-18 of the spec it
says that the 'required' attribute specifies that the user must
We talked about this for several days in
the EG. The discussion is stopped for now because I am waiting for a
clarification from Ed.
Ed’s
last comment was, “It turns out the Sun
implementation already does this for clear() on all the maps. I've just
checked in a change to the javadocs
It is no requirement - just a "recommendation".
I have seen the RI implementation, and that one is a little
complicated (something out of the sun blueprints). I wonder why it is
still that complicated with the security package in Java, but it is.
Do you know of any open source encryption implemen
I can't remember what I used the last time I dealt with this. I think
it was "bouncy castle." Not sure if its open source but I believe the
license is not very restrictive.
sean
On 10/5/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is no requirement - just a "recommendation".
>
> I have
Speaking of Intellij,
A reminder that all ASF committers can get a free license to IDEA. See
http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/opensource/asf.html
Not that we want to prescribe IDEs, but IMHO it's by far the best :)
Sean Schofield wrote:
But you would agree that we should not have tabs right?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-660?page=comments#action_12331407
]
Stan Silvert commented on MYFACES-660:
--
I tried your demo app on JBoss Portal and it works as designed. The counter
updates each time each portlet is refreshed. As fo
MyFaces FileUpload Issues
-
Key: MYFACES-668
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-668
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Tomahawk
Versions: 1.1.0
Reporter: David F
Their are two issues:
The first issues is M
Validation error
Key: MYFACES-669
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-669
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: General
Versions: 1.1.0
Environment: XP, IE, jboss-4.0.2
Reporter: hovan
I got the validation error toda
Where I've worked, we've always used tabs, because many IDEs can be
configured to visually display tabs as equivalent to any number of
spaces. (Plus, it's a lot easier to backspace one character, rather
than 4, to get rid of a tab.)
Just my two cents...
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From
@Sean
Yes, of course. No tabs.
@Grant
I must totally agree to your last sentence! ;-)
@Brendan
Backspace? For un-indent?
Not needed within a good editor: Just Enter and } and
your cursor is where it should be!:-)
Sorry for not beeing neutral...
:-)
Manfred
2005/10/5, CONNER, BRENDAN (S
Backspace? For un-indent?
Not needed within a good editor: Just Enter and } and
your cursor is where it should be!:-)
Hi "know-it-all,"
Yes, obviously that's true when you're first writing the code. I'm
thinking in terms of maintenance. Also, not every editor is as smart
for xml and jsp an
I just have download 1.1.1 (final) and check this issue. I put blank.war and
simple.war to Tomcat webapps folder. I got blank page always. It is true for
both Tomcat 5.0.28 and Tomcat 5.5.9
I wonder, what was the reason to name it 1.1.1 final if it contains such
blocker problem?
Do I have to re
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-660?page=comments#action_12331430
]
Tanju Erinmez commented on MYFACES-660:
---
If I understand you correctly, you tried jboss with the myfaces-impl_patch.jar,
invoked the button in portlet X and you saw th
Its not final. Its a release candidate. There is just an issue with
the build and how it names release candidates. An announcement was
made yesterday on both mailing lists explaining this.
sean
On 10/5/05, Sergey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just have download 1.1.1 (final) and check
Two improvements for implementation of issue MYFACES-272
Key: MYFACES-670
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-670
Project: MyFaces
Type: Improvement
Components: Implementation
Versions: 1.
Ok. I assume I missed the announcement twice. Is it a bad idea to rename the
distribution files from 1.1.1 to 1.1.1RC3?
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/myfaces/release/
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MyFaces Development"
Sent: Wednesday, October 05,
Component t:collapsiblePanel , on open action will submit the form and call
validators
---
Key: MYFACES-671
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-671
Project: MyFaces
Ty
Hi *,
I have added the first draft of a javascript date parser - it would be
great if you could check it out, add functionality as needed (should
be pretty straightforward) and (of course) use it!
regards,
Martin
RC2: Unsupported major.minor version 49.0
--
Key: MYFACES-672
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-672
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: General
Versions: 1.1.1
Environment: Tomcat 5.0.30, JDK 1.
Maybe you want to tell IntelliJ to stop putting the stock
header into your source files.
-- Jon
On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mmarinschek
Date: Wed Oct 5 13:29:11 2005
New Revision: 295103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=295103&view=rev
Log:
Trying to i
Allow Extensions Filter's facilities to be used by non-myfaces packages
---
Key: MYFACES-673
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-673
Project: MyFaces
Type: Wish
Versions: Nightly
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-654?page=comments#action_12331465
]
Manfred Klug commented on MYFACES-654:
--
I have checked the list twice, but who is perfect?
> HTML TLD differences between myFaces and the RI
> -
41 matches
Mail list logo
