+1
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 23:06 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
I believe code quality, documentation, examples and support for the
schedule component is good enough for it to be moved over to tomahawk.
my +1 for this.
regards,
Martin
After submit, backed bean date is one day before calendar selected day.
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-226
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-226
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Bug
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-223?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger closed TOMAHAWK-223:
--
Resolution: Invalid
You're missing the JSP 2.0 classes.
> Tree2 not working in Portlet Environment
> ---
I've now "MyFaces-ized" the addon. I tried (cut-and-paste hackery)
to make the css style of the page look like our web page -- not too
terrible considering that I'm css-ignorant.
I've also copied our component-template into the addon templates.
So there's now a very easy process (once you insta
Yes copy preserves the history as well so you are ok.
Sean
On 3/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like you moved this to the tomahawk proper. Is that what you
> wanted? If so then it looks right. The best way to check is to use
> your browser to checkout svn repo and see if things are where you want
> them. Just go to http://s
> What are you using for the command-line version of svn?
I'm using 'c:\Program Files\Subversion\bin' in my path. I think I had
to install this separately form the subversion website.
> Also, this was the commit message -- does it look right for a move?
> There was also a corresponding "remove"
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=comments#action_12372710
]
Dennis Byrne commented on TOMAHAWK-224:
---
Gerald,
This was happening to my patches using Eclipse 3.1 and Subclipse. I upgraded
subclipse and it stopped. I forget t
Jacob,
have a look at UIComponentPerspective, implemented by Martin. This
should be what you are looking for.
cheers,
Gerald
On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't seen this in myfaces svn?
>
> http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.2/docs/api/javax/faces/com
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-50?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-50:
-
Resolution: Fixed
change package name from org.apache.maven to org.apache.myfaces.maven
> Maven plugin repackaging
>
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=comments#action_12372705
]
Gerald Müllan commented on TOMAHAWK-224:
Hm..sorry, seems like i made some mistake when creating the patch. Martin
hasn`t commited it till now, so i will have a loo
I guess I was confused. What Martin implemented was Tomahawk
UIComponentPerspective.executeOn().
I guess the question is whether we can implement it directly on
UIComponent in such a way as that we still pass the TCK.
On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't seen th
I haven't seen this in myfaces svn?
http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.2/docs/api/javax/faces/component/UIComponent.html#invokeOnComponent(javax.faces.context.FacesContext,%20java.lang.String,%20javax.faces.component.ContextCallback)
>On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
If anyone's interested, Henning (with some help from me) has gotten
XMLMind configured so that it supports maven xdocs. I'm not entirely
certain how to use it to create new document sections, but editing an
existing document or starting from a myfaces xdoc template should make
writing xdoc stuff
On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any way you guys could jump on the invokeOnComponent w/ Callbacks early from
> JSF 1.2 to get this system in place for all components now?
Hey Jacob.
I think it's already in MyFaces. Have you tried it?
Any way you guys could jump on the invokeOnComponent w/ Callbacks early from
JSF 1.2 to get this system in place for all components now?
>[
>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=comments#action_12372689
> ]
>
>Mario Ivankovits commented on TOMAHAWK-224:
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=comments#action_12372689
]
Mario Ivankovits commented on TOMAHAWK-224:
---
This type of patch is very strange - and dangerous. It replaces the whole file
instead of patching only the code in q
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-225?page=all ]
Martin Marinschek closed TOMAHAWK-225:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Martin Marinschek
Thanks again Gerald for providing this patch.
> New component TableSuggestAjax
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-225?page=all ]
Gerald Müllan updated TOMAHAWK-225:
---
> New component TableSuggestAjax
> --
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-225
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHA
>Btw. regarding the sandbox, I see it as a huge problem that some vendors
>have started to integrate the sandbox as component set into their tools.
Whoa, really? Which ones? That's going to be expensive for someone.
Dennis Byrne
New component TableSuggestAjax
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-225
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-225
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: New Feature
Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Gerald Müllan
Priority: Minor
Fi
Sean,
What are you using for the command-line version of svn?
Also, this was the commit message -- does it look right for a move?
There was also a corresponding "remove" message.
===
Added:
myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/sandbox/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=all ]
Martin Marinschek closed TOMAHAWK-224:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Martin Marinschek
Thanks Gerald for providing this patch.
> Making Ajax components work properly in dataTa
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224?page=all ]
Gerald Müllan updated TOMAHAWK-224:
---
> Making Ajax components work properly in dataTables
> --
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-224
> URL: htt
Making Ajax components work properly in dataTables
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-224
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-224
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Improvement
Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: G
I have tortoise svn but I use the command line for moving.
svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trunk/foo/somefile.txt
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trunk/bar/somefile.txt -m
"log message here"
If you get into trouble just stop where you are and post to the list.
Myself o
OK I created the branches and fixed the poms in preparation for
release. I will try to get a release candidate ready shortly.
Sean
On 3/30/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use a snapshot as well, all fine for us.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 3/29/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EM
On 3/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sounds reasonalbe.
> some small example to get an idea, what the component does is a good
> (minimum) requirement.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 3/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suppose that an example would make a
On 3/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am 0 on this, but I feel it is worth mentioning that there are already
> > components in tomahawk that don't work w/ the RI though.
>
>
> 0 is a good choice on that ;-)
First off, Schedule might run fine on the RI. I just doubt th
Hi.
I seem to remember that there were talk about adding support for HTTP/GET
requests in MyFaces, but I can't find it in the archive.
If so - how much work has been done in this area and what is missing ?
If not - where do I start to look in the code ? And what issues should I
consider.
I've
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> I'm explicitly -1 on putting this restriction on new components in the
> sandbox.
>
> The sandbox is a playground, and this is what it is supposed to be.
>
> I am +1 on only allowing a component to get to tomahawk if all those
> requirements are met.
>
> And by the
That sounds reasonalbe.
some small example to get an idea, what the component does is a good
(minimum) requirement.
-Matthias
On 3/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose that an example would make a good minimum requirement for the
> sandbox.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
I suppose that an example would make a good minimum requirement for the sandbox.
regards,
Martin
On 3/31/06, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand: How are users thought to use and test a new
> sandbox-component if not at least a minimal amount of informations
33 matches
Mail list logo
