Thank you for this work Stan.
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Stan Silvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:12 AM
>To: 'MyFaces Development', [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors
>meeting]
>
>Done
Done.
A few notes:
- I think I counted 95 new or modified source files. You have plenty of
new stuff to play with.
- It compiles and runs - honest it does. However, I'm sure that it
won't build with maven. I haven't touched the build scripts. I've been
building with NetBeans.
- You will need
Hi all,I finally moved the schedule component to Tomahawk. So, anyone who's interested, please check out the head revision and test the thing...Cheers,Jurgen
There is some code in HtmlResponseStateManager.writeState that stores the view
state. It checks to see if the tree structure and/or the component states are
of type String. Can this be removed?
Dennis Byrne
Paralellize state saving w/ multi-threading
---
Key: MYFACES-1314
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1314
Project: MyFaces Core
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Dennis Byrne
Assigned to: Dennis Byrne
At the l
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-76?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-76:
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Tobago doesn't run with RI 1.1_02
> -
>
> Key: TOBAGO-76
> URL: http://issues.apache
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-75?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-75:
-
Resolution: Fixed
> The password attribute of tc:in works only as a method binding in facelets
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-72?page=comments#action_12413645 ]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-72:
-
I think the reason for this problem is that the DateRenderer create components
at renderer time.
We should try to create the componen
>
> It will be JBoss 5.0 containing JSF 1.2, Tomcat 6, EJB 3, and Seam.
> Probably Facelets too.
BTW, don't take this to mean that we currently have plans to ship
Facelets with JBoss. I was just answering the full question. Yes, I
think Facelets is cool and I'll probably be using it in the near
Well, in a way yes: the sandbox POM, /tomahawk/sandbox/pom.xml has no version specified, so the version is taken from its parent, being /tomahawk/pom.xml which has the version 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT. The POM for the sandbox examples was pointing to the sandbox-project artifact with version
1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
Thanks Jurgen!
Can you explain the problem for me more? By sandbox parent POM, you mean the
tomahawk POM?
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Jurgen Lust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 03:21 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Re: sandbox-project:pom:1.1.
It should be solved now. The sandbox core POM pointed to an incorrect version of the sandbox parent POM.2006/5/28, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:+1 for meOn 5/28/06,
Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, same issue on my boxOn 5/28/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Any
(2)
On 5/27/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May I ask a question out loud?
In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
to use in the next half year.
Can you answer with the correspon
+1 for meOn 5/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, same issue on my boxOn 5/28/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Anyone else getting this on a fresh co ?>> Dennis Byrne>>
> D:\co\myfaces\current\tomahawk\sandbox>mvn clean> [INFO] Scanning for projects...> [INFO] ---
That's easy.
It will be JBoss 5.0 containing JSF 1.2, Tomcat 6, EJB 3, and Seam.
Probably Facelets too.
:-)
Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:10 AM
> To
Hi!
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
and
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
>
TC6 after the first few stable builds. If no other technique requires
ist, I am not sure if we move away from tomcat.
Its also not sure if we ever move to facelets. Especially when upcoming
j
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1164?page=comments#action_12413629
]
Jeremy Green commented on MYFACES-1164:
---
See also MYFACES-612.
> Cannot forward after response has been committed
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-612?page=comments#action_12413628
]
Jeremy Green commented on MYFACES-612:
--
I''ve just tried upgrading to MyFaces core 1.1.3, and both my test application
(above) and real application still fail:
.
.
200
yes, same issue on my box
On 5/28/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else getting this on a fresh co ?
Dennis Byrne
D:\co\myfaces\current\tomahawk\sandbox>mvn clean
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
Hi,
Trying to build MyFaces with Maven does not work for me.
The build stops during sandbox-examples with following messages:
- GraphicImageDynamicBean.java:[18,44] package
org.apache.myfaces.custom.fileupload does not exist
- Out
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-450?page=all ]
Ondrej Svetlik updated TOMAHAWK-450:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> inputHtml component without a form produces NotNullException - it is able to
> warn
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-450?page=comments#action_12413618
]
Ondrej Svetlik commented on TOMAHAWK-450:
-
Of course, there is no NotNullException. It produces NullPointerException,
sorry for that.
> inputHtml component without
22 matches
Mail list logo
