[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499498
]
Jesper Pedersen commented on TOMAHAWK-922:
--
The JspTilesViewHandlerImpl should be based on Tiles-2.0 from
Default converters and validators not correctly registered
--
Key: MYFACES-1651
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1651
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Allow the sandbox examples to be build with the different configurations (1.1
and 1.2 for both myfaces and ri)
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1010
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved TOMAHAWK-1010.
Resolution: Fixed
Allow the sandbox examples to be build with the different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved TRINIDAD-41.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in the branch of may
Create more specific packageContains
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1650.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I submitted a fix for this yesterday
convertDateTime tag not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1643.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Bruno Aranda
Hi,
For backwards compatibility, when restoring the view we need to know
if older (1.2) ViewHandler and StateManager are used in order to fall
into 1.1 behaviour if they are older. The RI checks the faces-config
file of the artifact [1], inferring the version from the XML grammar
(name of the
Well, you could use reflection if from the tomahawk you check the
version of JSF being used. But we are talking here about the opposite,
in order to restore the view correctly the JSF implementation needs to
know the version used by the artifact to know which behaviour to
follow... tomahawk is
Hi,
I would like to create a branch for tomahawk to start playing with the
autogeneration of tomahawk components. So this is meant to be the
branch for the future Tomahawk 2.0, that will work with jsf 1.2+. Any
objections?
Bruno
Yes, I am afraid there is not much documentation (always necessary)
for that plugin and I still have to look often into the code to
understand what it does. The plugin has too many goals and many
configuration attributes. For MyFaces 1.2 I took most of the trinidad
configuration, with only some
On 5/28/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to create a branch for tomahawk to start playing with the
autogeneration of tomahawk components. So this is meant to be the
branch for the future Tomahawk 2.0, that will work with jsf 1.2+. Any
objections?
Let's not choose a
Ok, well, as any version of tomahawk will be compatible with 1.2, I
will just call it tomahawk_next_20070528.
Cheers,
Bruno
On 28/05/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/28/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to create a branch for tomahawk to start playing with
Hi,
I badly needed for such a plugin last week but because of issues like
documentation and java5 stuff, I couldn't use it. Instead I had to create my
own plugin at sourceforge that generates, tld, faces-config, tag files,
facelets taglibs and components. Anyway it'd be great to see the trinidad
Current shared 2.0 and 3.0 should be compatible
---
Key: MYFACES-1652
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1652
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Task
Components: JSR-252
I agree, we should have a lot more documentation, and
also be deploying a plugins site in general.
Also, yes, the code is written to target Java 5. All of
the current consumers (MyFaces 1.2 and Trinidad) require
Java 5, so that hasn't been a problem up to this point.
-- Adam
On 5/28/07,
On 5/28/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For backwards compatibility, when restoring the view we need to know
if older (1.2) ViewHandler and StateManager are used in order to fall
into 1.1 behaviour if they are older. The RI checks the faces-config
file of the artifact [1],
The sad news is that this field should never have been
added to UIComponentTagBase in the RI either - there's no
other logger instances exposed like this (others are private
static, as they should be), and this API was never
discussed on the EG. But since it's there, MyFaces has
to add it too.
18 matches
Mail list logo