[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-1188) many HtmlCheckbox rendered with the same id with HtmlSelectManyChecbox spread layout

many HtmlCheckbox rendered with the same id with HtmlSelectManyChecbox spread layout Key: TOMAHAWK-1188 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1188

Re: [VOTE] Partial triggers and :: naming

yeah, I am in that boat as well. clearer. -Matthias On Jan 31, 2008 11:37 PM, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like this solution because it is much clearer to me. I would like to know/investigate what someone would have to change in his jspx file between this solution and the

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

I look at the vast list of bugs raised against tomahawk 1.1.6, and look at the scary output of the maven reports (findbugs, pmd, etc) and think that there are higher priorities than reinventing the build process right now, when the current approach works. Yes it is ugly, but 1.1.7 is mostly a

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi Simon, And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified. does this stem from actually trying it out? I tried it in the project I am currently working on, and it worked. I need to admit I did not check

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-722) Javascript in Tomahawk components produces invalid markup when output as application/xhtml + xml with 1.2 RI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564726#action_12564726 ] Michael Heinen commented on TOMAHAWK-722: - The cdata section around the script

Tomahawk compatibility table

Hi, I'm getting really annoyed with all the why isn't the tomahawk compatibility table up to date questions. Unless someone vetos it, I'll just rip that page out of the site tonight, and put the existing info up on the wiki instead. Then users have only themselves to blame if it is not

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Simon, And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified. does this stem from actually trying it out? I tried it in the project I am currently

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-880) Clientside validation errors when using PPR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564770#action_12564770 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on TRINIDAD-880: --- hello graeme, thank you for

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi Simon, Zdenek, There is still the question of whether the TCK would pass if classes in javax.faces had package-scoped parents that are not defined in the spec. Is there someone here that can check that? If that is allowable, then this base-class approach becomes much more interesting...

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi Zdenek, A question was raised about why state isn't retrieved from the attributes map - this cannot be used, however, cause it would use reflection internally and call the getter of the method, if a value is not directly stored in the attributes map. As soon as the getter is called, after

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi all, some clarifications from my side: Quote 1: One of the last developers to work on the old code-generation framework commented that it was very painful. Not sure whether this comment was about the basic concept of this approach, or just the implementation. It was about changes made

Re: Tomahawk compatibility table

On Feb 1, 2008 2:06 PM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm getting really annoyed with all the why isn't the tomahawk compatibility table up to date questions. :-) Unless someone vetos it, I'll just rip that page out of the site tonight, and put the existing info up on the

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi, Simon Kitching napsal(a): Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Simon, And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified. does this stem from actually trying it out? I

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi, Martin Marinschek napsal(a): Hi Zdenek, A question was raised about why state isn't retrieved from the attributes map - this cannot be used, however, cause it would use reflection internally and call the getter of the method, if a value is not directly stored in the attributes map. As

Re: [Trinidad] add method to get an application scoped concurrentMap to RequestContext (TRINIDAD-926)

Hey Gab - Originally I was concerned that we were adding this API in order to work around lock contention issues in ServletContext implementations, which I would prefer to see addressed by the ServletContext implementations rather than by adding a workaround to Trinidad. However, if the deal is

Re: [Trinidad] add method to get an application scoped concurrentMap to RequestContext (TRINIDAD-926)

Hi, Yes, I think I wasn't clear. :-) Okay, so I think I have a +1 from everyone who commented now Thanks, Gab Andy Schwartz wrote: Hey Gab - Originally I was concerned that we were adding this API in order to work around lock contention issues in ServletContext implementations, which I

Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Code Generation by SimonKitching

Hi Zdenek, writing: - check if special setter - use it AND - store in map this won't work, of course - we are in a setter already, so we cannot use the attribute-map - thanks for setting me straight again. What you are suggesting would effectively change the API of every single JSF-component

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1812) All faces-config.xml get loaded twice from jars in WEB-INF/lib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564867#action_12564867 ] Val Blant commented on MYFACES-1812: Tested 1.2.3-SNAPSHOT - works as expected now.

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-915) overridding converter/validator messages does only work on the server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias Weßendorf resolved TRINIDAD-915. - Resolution: Fixed overridding converter/validator messages does only work on

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-891) Locking issues coming from restore state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564883#action_12564883 ] Gabrielle Crawford commented on TRINIDAD-891: - You need to set this in

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-926) add method to get an application scoped concurrentMap to RequestContext

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabrielle Crawford resolved TRINIDAD-926. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core added api as described

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-891) Locking issues coming from restore state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabrielle Crawford resolved TRINIDAD-891. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core store a map of name-class

RE: Tomahawk compatibility table

I am disappointed by the attitude expressed here. Testing whether two related projects are compatible should be a basic part of the release process. It is simple QA. That so many releases have gone through without such an essential check raises questions about the competence of those involved

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-933) animation-enabled setting is turned off by default, It should be on

animation-enabled setting is turned off by default, It should be on --- Key: TRINIDAD-933 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-933 Project: MyFaces Trinidad

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-933) animation-enabled setting is turned off by default, It should be on

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkata Guddanti updated TRINIDAD-933: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) animation-enabled setting is turned off by

Re: Tomahawk compatibility table

Hi Richard, thanks for doubting our competence - you can be sure that we test the latest release of myfaces-impl with the latest release of tomahawk, and IMHO, this should be enough. regards, Martin On 2/1/08, Barbalace, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am disappointed by the attitude

Patch Updated for (TRINIDAD-921) Add/Fix Support for Windows Mobile 6/5 and BlackBerry

Hi Gabrielle, I incorporated responses to your feedbacks against the original patch. I would appreciate if you can take a look. Thanks, Tadashi

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-933) animation-enabled setting is turned off by default, It should be on

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeanne Waldman updated TRINIDAD-933: Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) checked the patch in

Re: Tomahawk compatibility table

On Feb 1, 2008 1:01 PM, Barbalace, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Testing whether two related projects are compatible should be a basic part of the release process. It is simple QA. IMO It's a bit much to ask a release manager to cross check against every other release. It takes a *lot*