Hi Zdenek, > A question was raised about why state isn't retrieved from the > attributes map - this cannot be used, however, cause it would use > reflection internally and call the getter of the method, if a value is > not directly stored in the attributes map. As soon as the getter is > called, after the check for the local value returns null, you will get > back the value from a value-expression, and you do not want to save this > value in the state, as the value-expression itself is already stored!
so you want to get rid of the concept of a local value completely, and store everything in the attribute map? Now I see. This might actually work, yes. regards, Martin
