Re: [MyFaces 2.0] / [JSF 2.0] SPEC not too clear on setParent() description = MYFACES-2389 review request

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org wrote: Hi Matthias, that has not been discussed on the EG, so I can't confirm your version of the code. However, it seems reasonable to me. OK, yeah, I just did refactoring :-) not added anything (wild). thanks for the

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-2389) clean up the UIComponentBase.setParent()

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias Weßendorf resolved MYFACES-2389. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha clean up the

Is there a MyFaces-2.0 milestone release?

2009-10-27 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! Is there a milestone release of the JSR-314 MyFaces-2.0 somewhere on a maven repo? If not, would you mind to create one in the foreseeable future? I'm asking this, because we (Apache OpenWebBeans) like to use MyFaces for our JSF2 samples, but we'd need a non-snapshot release for our M4

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered

2009-10-27 Thread KPanneerselvam
Hi Simon, Thanks for responding. I'm not quite sure what you mean by getter code for the navigation bar. Are you asking about the getter/setter for the navigation bar in my backing bean? public class TestBean { private HtmlNavigationBar navigationBar; public

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered

2009-10-27 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi, Yes I was, and it does seem correctly done too... Who's in charge of calling the formSubmitted method? Is is an action on a commandLink/Button? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:56 AM, kpanneersel...@inautix.co.in wrote: Hi Simon, Thanks for responding. I'm not quite sure what you mean

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered

2009-10-27 Thread KPanneerselvam
Hi, The formSubmitted() is an action on a command button like this: h:commandButton value=Submit action=#{testBean.formSubmitted} / Thanks. Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com 10/27/2009 07:43 PM Please respond to MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org To MyFaces

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered full source code included

2009-10-27 Thread KPanneerselvam
OK. Here is a highly simplified case of the problem (source included): The custom component 'repeat' will simply iterate through its children and renders them. Usage: netx:repeat binding=#{testBean.htmlRepeat} h:outputText value=Child-1/ h:outputText value=Child-2/

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-2375) managed-bean-scope could also be an EL expression, to allow easy implementation of new scopes

2009-10-27 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-2375: Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha Assignee: Leonardo Uribe

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered

2009-10-27 Thread Simon Lessard
Ugh, it should work fine... It looks like the base tag code fail to detect that the component already exists when rereading the JSP... You use jsp right? not facelet? ~ Simon On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:17 AM, kpanneersel...@inautix.co.in wrote: Hi, The formSubmitted() is an action

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-2366) RestoreViewExecutor should check also if the server is showing an error page when check for postback

2009-10-27 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-2366: Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha Assignee: Leonardo Uribe

Re: Custom component with children - Child component added dynamically at end appears as first child when rendered full source code included

2009-10-27 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi, This is a good explanation. Is it possible for you to test a JSP version? To be honest, I'm a bit flabbergasted to see something like that happen in Facelet. Can you check the state of the component's children within the formSubmitted method? ~ Simon On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM,

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1611) implement new setParent() behavior on UIXComponent base in order to trigger PostAddToViewEvent(s)

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
implement new setParent() behavior on UIXComponent base in order to trigger PostAddToViewEvent(s) - Key: TRINIDAD-1611 URL:

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1610) Relocatable Resources support in Trinidad

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
Relocatable Resources support in Trinidad - Key: TRINIDAD-1610 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1610 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: New Feature Components:

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Relocatable Resources - API proposal

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I created two tickets: Renderer modification = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1610 Event part (setParent() behavior) = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1611 -Matthias On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: oh, yeah... of

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-2390) h:graphic image doesn't handle library attribue

2009-10-27 Thread Michael Concini (JIRA)
h:graphic image doesn't handle library attribue --- Key: MYFACES-2390 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2390 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Bug Components: JSR-314

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1612) Add support for the new Lifecycle Management Methods (see spec section 3.1.14)

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
Add support for the new Lifecycle Management Methods (see spec section 3.1.14) -- Key: TRINIDAD-1612 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1612 Project: MyFaces

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] calling popComponentFromEL/pushComponentToEL setParent() ?

2009-10-27 Thread Blake Sullivan
I don't think that it should do this. There is no guarantee that any of the ancestors will have pushed their context in this case and in the absence of such a guarantee, pushing context is dangerous because it means that there would be no way to guarantee correct EL context setup for

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2374) UIViewRoot.getBeforePhaseListener() and UIViewRoot.getAfterPhaseListener() could be called on PhaseId.RESTORE_VIEW

2009-10-27 Thread Jakob Korherr (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770633#action_12770633 ] Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2374: The RI 2.0.1 does not call afterPhase on

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1613) Add support for rowKey change

2009-10-27 Thread Jing Wu (JIRA)
Add support for rowKey change - Key: TRINIDAD-1613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1613 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Improvement Components: Components Affects Versions:

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Lifecycle Management Methods (3.1.14)

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1612 and I also created a subtask to put the new event handling system into the lifecycle methods; = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1614 On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1614) add new system events implementation for the lifecycle methods, like processXyz

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
add new system events implementation for the lifecycle methods, like processXyz --- Key: TRINIDAD-1614 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1614 Project:

[jsf 2.0] UIViewRoot afterPhase

2009-10-27 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi, While working on MYFACES-2374 UIViewRoot.getBeforePhaseListener() and UIViewRoot.getAfterPhaseListener() could be called on PhaseId.RESTORE_VIEW, I found out that the mojarra javadoc was changed, so that only UIViewRoot.getAfterPhaseListener should be called on RESTORE_VIEW. Mojarra javadoc

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-1615) Need MetaTagHandler implementation for the Facelets package

2009-10-27 Thread Max Starets (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Max Starets updated TRINIDAD-1615: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Need MetaTagHandler implementation for the Facelets

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1615) Need MetaTagHandler implementation for the Facelets package

2009-10-27 Thread Max Starets (JIRA)
Need MetaTagHandler implementation for the Facelets package --- Key: TRINIDAD-1615 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1615 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: New

Re: [jsf 2.0] UIViewRoot afterPhase

2009-10-27 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi Jakob, Because after restore view is actually one of the most used (along with before render) and was specifically added to 2.0 for that purpose. It's not possible to make it different because the spec say so, and thus MyFaces might not pas the TCK if it was made differently. So, there's

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Lifecycle Management Methods (3.1.14)

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
There is a patch attached to TRINIDAD-1614. This contains both fixes for TRINIDAD-1614 and TRINIDAD-1612 (as TRINIDAD-1614 is just a sub-task) -Matthias On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: I created a ticket for this:

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1612) Add support for the new Lifecycle Management Methods (see spec section 3.1.14)

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770656#action_12770656 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1612: -- TRINIDAD-1614 contains a

[Trinidad 2.0] relocatable res support on existing components (trh:script)?

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, there are some new standard tags that are going to register resources with the tr:document, once these tasks are committed/implemented: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1610 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1611 Should we add similar support to our existing tags?

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] calling popComponentFromEL/pushComponentToEL setParent() ?

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
ok, we keep it as it is. We will see what the TCK says for MyFaces. (once we are actually able to run it) -M On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote: I don't think that it should do this.  There is no guarantee that any of the ancestors will have pushed

Re: JSF 2.0 - Bean Validation, Unified EL and other specs

2009-10-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Jan-Kees, thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like to see something like this. Sounds (to me) very useful... -M On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote: Just to be complete...

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2290) Add OSGi bundle information and bundle classloader / activator

2009-10-27 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770739#action_12770739 ] Felix Röthenbacher commented on MYFACES-2290: - What do you understand by the

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2290) Add OSGi bundle information and bundle classloader / activator

2009-10-27 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770744#action_12770744 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2290: - We can't add public classes on

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] relocatable res support on existing components (trh:script)?

2009-10-27 Thread Andrew Robinson
Do we need this or should we just deprecate trh:script and recommend f:outputScript? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi, there are some new standard tags that are going to register resources with the tr:document, once these tasks are

[myfaces core - osgi] Problem with OSGi patch on MYFACES-2290

2009-10-27 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Trying to solve MYFACES-2290 Add OSGi bundle information and bundle classloader / activator, it was submitted a patch that adds some new classes required by OSGi to handle classloader calls correctly. This classes requires be public and one be mentioned in myfaces-api MANIFEST.MF as