[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13019631#comment-13019631
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2083:
-
Okay. Well I ran the TCK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13019633#comment-13019633
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2083:
-
Yeah, I looked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13019640#comment-13019640
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-211:
-
Cool. I found a way
Hey everyone,
Just FYI, I'd like to tag Trinidad 2.0 for a new release tomorrow if we
can. I fixed the Bridge issue (or rather passed it one because it was
already fixed :) ) and checked in many of the remaining patches. I'll
do another pass of checking in patches tomorrow before I tag but
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Hazem Saleh haz...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018923#comment-13018923
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
I'm going to be committing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018924#comment-13018924
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
BTW- In the future, it helps if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-2059:
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018935#comment-13018935
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-997:
I agree. This is a pretty old issue so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-997:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
span tag with no attributes is not rendered when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018949#comment-13018949
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2058:
-
Volker, I am working on sumitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018966#comment-13018966
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-1910 at 4/12/11 6:22 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018964#comment-13018964
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1910:
-
Yes. This is a stop gap and, IMO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-2058.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
Thanks for the submission
PPR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13018978#comment-13018978
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1834:
-
Sounds like the patch has some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-1834:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
tr:showDetail prompt facet doesn't fire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-1771:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha-2
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
We should probably check on all the subprojects..
Scott
On 04/07/2011 09:57 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
that's a good question.
at least i'm not aware of it.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
That was kind of my thinking as well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Robinson andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't see that 2.0 is any less stable 1.2 at this point. I think we can
probably remove the beta soon IMO.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Scott O'Bryan
with the 3.0.0 bridge before you do the next
release. It seems to have taken a step backwards (with respect to the
bridge) since its previous release(s).
-Mike-
On 4/5/2011 5:12 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
That was kind of my thinking as well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Andrew
,
Scott O'Bryan
+1
Did a quick check of the artifacts and they look good. I didn't TRY
them, but it's an alpha release and it should allow us to more
effectively test Trinidad going forward. Good work guys..
Scott
On 04/01/2011 10:42 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Sorry to push on this but I would like to
Forgot to vote.. :) +1
On 03/24/2011 10:32 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark
Hi,
Thanks to all the people who voted.
We have 5 +1 votes:
Max Starets
Andy Schwartz
Leonardo Uribe
Blake Sullivan
Scott O'Bryan
No +0 or -1 votes. I will now proceed with the release.
Scott
+1
On Mar 25, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/3/24 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
+1
2011/3/24 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.2 release of Apache
MyFaces Test out.
Note
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011416#comment-13011416
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2071:
-
I guess the larger question here
and don't forget to vote early and
often. :D The vote will stay open for at least 72 hours to give people
a chance to respond.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-035
[2]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/tags/maven
Well there ya go. Thanks for commenting Leonardo. I did not know
that.. :D
Is this going to be a showstopper for the release or (since it's
ignored) are people okay with having it in our FacesConfig for now? I
personally think it can't hurt but the spec does seem pretty clear on
the
I, for one, am all for having it in. It's not like it will break anything
and if it gives a performance boost, all the better.
Max, we may want to generate a bug against the spec to see if they can fix
that. Is that possible?
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Max Starets max.star...@oracle.com
Hey Andy,
I'm wondering if there should be a TCK check for this as well since the
behavior has come into question.
Scott
On 03/24/2011 03:57 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
Gang -
Looking back at the EG emails, I realize now that I dropped the ball
on making sure that my proposed changes actually
WOW!! Someone's on the ball. Way to move on this Leonardo. It was an
awesome observation...
Scott
On 03/24/2011 04:04 PM, Leonardo Uribe (JIRA) wrote:
faces-config.xml metadata-complete=true on jar files under META-INF are
recognized, but not documented
Is that a +1? :D
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do
+1
On 03/22/2011 11:56 PM, Martin Marinschek wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Here is my +1
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Mark Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
took your key from here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009035#comment-13009035
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-189:
-
I'm assuming you follow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009036#comment-13009036
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-191:
-
Yeah, I'm not sure why
release.
They can be done together. For reference: look how Leonardo did the
last MyFaces core releases in the wiki.
If you want, Ali, I can help you with the release next week!
Regards,
Jakob
Am Sonntag, 20. März 2011 schrieb Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com:
I'll see if I can't cough up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13008789#comment-13008789
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-199:
-
I'm fine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13008805#comment-13008805
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-196:
-
Why do we need
Ali, I think I'd suggest actually doing this like Trinidad, Orchestra, and
the Portlet Bridge do this in that they actually download the main shared
and instrument to code when THIER impl builds. That way you don't have to
release shared.
If that's not acceptable, you can simply install your new
and it is not released
yet.
Thanks,
Ali
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ali, I think I'd suggest actually doing this like Trinidad, Orchestra, and
the Portlet Bridge do this in that they actually download the main shared
and instrument to code when THIER
I'll see if I can't cough up an example later tonight.
On Mar 19, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
No, your not getting me. MyFaces-shared-orchestra does not exist in MyFaces
shared, it exists in Orchestra.. That's where I got the process I used in
early releases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13007924#comment-13007924
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2065:
-
Very cool idea Markus. It's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-2062.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
1.2.15-core
Yes, I agree Andy. That proposed API scared me a bit because it
seemed that we were trying to do to much in a single method call.
There was a redirect message, a script and noop params. If we can
separate them and use the real redirect functionality built into the
EC, I'm good. :D
On Mar 14,
static void renderNoopResponse(FacesContext context) throws
IOException
Thanks,
-Yuan
On 3/14/2011 7:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Yes, I agree Andy. That proposed API scared me a bit because it
seemed that we were trying to do to much in a single method call.
There was a redirect message
-2062
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Before JSF 2.0, there was no way to get the writer from the externalContext
except off the native objects. Trinidad has very complex requirements for
Portal-related components so
I like the idea of having three more simple API's although I think the
redirect is unnecessary.. That should be handled correctly by
ExtenalContext.redirect, even in PPR environments.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 8:57 AM, Andy Schwartz andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw - another variant would be to
FacesContext.responseComplete() to do the noop would be less error
prone.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the idea of having three more simple API's although I think the
redirect is unnecessary.. That should be handled correctly by
ExtenalContext.redirect
+1 to all of these comments..
On Mar 12, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Andy Schwartz andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yuan -
The documentation/contract isn't especially clear:
* This method completes the PPR request and writes a noop/ to the
response.
* it also handles script and redirect
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005716#comment-13005716
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2057:
-
Blake's patch was not able
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005727#comment-13005727
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
I agree that redirect after post
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005731#comment-13005731
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
Okay, yeah. We're clearly
Hey Mike, do we have JIRA tickets for the Trinidad patches needed?
Also, what are the challenges with the MyFaces core? I, for one,
would like to see this fixed ASAP..
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005185#comment-13005185
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
I guess my question is, why isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005195#comment-13005195
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2059:
-
Okay, thinking about this issue more
+1 Andy..
On 03/10/2011 12:39 PM, Blake Sullivan wrote:
Looks good.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 3/10/11 11:36 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
Gang -
I would like to add a utility method for locating the nearest
non-flattening ancestor component, as discussed here:
I suppose I don't mind the currently implementation but I'm not sure I
understand Point #2. Adding an interface does not change binary
backward compatibility does it? Likewise, having a public getWrapped()
method wouldn't have any conflicts if the interface was applied later.
From a pretty
+1
On Mar 10, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam
pavitra.subraman...@oracle.com wrote:
+1 for the current approach :).
Pavitra
On 3/10/2011 2:34 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
I am thinking that I will roll with my current approach since we can
always transparently implement FacesWrapper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-1581.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.12-core
Add the ability to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13004243#comment-13004243
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2054:
-
I don't know if I understand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-2054:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Messages from exceptions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13003461#comment-13003461
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-997:
I'll look at committing this soon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13003463#comment-13003463
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2051:
-
Hey Marcus, is this an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13003464#comment-13003464
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2051:
-
Hey Marcus, thanks for finding
Well, it's impossible for repeat to implement a naming container for quite a
few reasons. The thing is, I think your treating UI:repeat as if it was a
stamped type component and it's not. It's a tag and I think that you end up
with more then one component in the component tree with the same id.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000962#comment-13000962
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
What would you consider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000964#comment-13000964
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
BTW- Changing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000964#comment-13000964
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-2046 at 3/1/11 5:09 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000966#comment-13000966
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
Okay, I re-read the parent bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000966#comment-13000966
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-2046 at 3/1/11 5:10 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13000972#comment-13000972
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2042:
-
In addition to my fixes, this does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-2042.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
Issue fixed. Tested with Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001029#comment-13001029
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-2046 at 3/1/11 7:11 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001029#comment-13001029
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
Very cool. Thanks for testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001029#comment-13001029
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-2046 at 3/1/11 7:10 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001029#comment-13001029
]
Scott O'Bryan edited comment on TRINIDAD-2046 at 3/1/11 7:12 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001055#comment-13001055
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
Cool. I think we have enough to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001063#comment-13001063
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1027:
-
Well, I was going through.. Ahem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001072#comment-13001072
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1436:
-
Thomas,
I'm going through some very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001086#comment-13001086
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1813:
-
Going over some old bugs and seeing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001091#comment-13001091
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2006:
-
Matthias. This looks good so I'm
Hey all, I was going through our tickets in Trinidad and we have quite a
few very old tickets in the Trinidad JIRA queue. Some bugs which have
been around since 2007 (Trinidad 1.0.3 etc.). Do people mind if I go
through these and try to clean the old ones out. It might give us a
better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001102#comment-13001102
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2046:
-
Sounds good Xiaoming
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001200#comment-13001200
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1709:
-
Sweet Andy, thanks for looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-1777:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
new JS execution order if in head
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001268#comment-13001268
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1409:
-
This looks cool Leonardo. Just so I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott O'Bryan resolved TRINIDAD-1471.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.12-core
This issue has been resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13001287#comment-13001287
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1409:
-
Yeah, I think you hit the nail
+1
On Feb 24, 2011, at 3:19 AM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/24 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12997924#comment-12997924
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-2042:
-
This was due to some local
* [TRINIDAD-2037] - Unable to build from source archive
Improvement
* [TRINIDAD-1767] - Warn and no-op on SkinFactory.addSkin for duplicate
skins.
Regards,
Scott O'Bryan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12997169#comment-12997169
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1890:
-
BTW- I'll take this over since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12997167#comment-12997167
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-1890:
-
Are you using the default's
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Plugins
Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
Assignee: Scott O'Bryan
When running 'mvn site:site' on main, the following error is thrown:
org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException
Hey everyone, the release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 is all but done however the
website does not build for some reason on main. I'm going to het his figured
out and I'll make the announcement once it's deployed.
On a remaining note, I'm going to be on a business trip next week so I'll have
Hey everybody, thanks for Voting. Here are the final results for the
Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2[1]:
+1: Scott O'Bryan, Max Starets, Matthias Wessendorf, Matt Cooper, Nathan
Hokanson, Blake Sullivan
+0: None
-1: None
Thanks everyone for voting. I'll complete the release.
Scott
Hey all, I uploaded representations of the Bridge and Trinidad logos
into JIRA. Let me know if there are any issues.
Flipping sweet Gerard. I used the old logo for the Bridges' JIRA logo. I'm
going to used a cropped version of yours, it will square better. ;)
I'll see about updating the Trinidad and Bridge sites as well.
Thanks!!
Scotr
On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
..
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/
[3]
https
+1
On 02/16/2011 07:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the
issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have
been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This
is still a beta
401 - 500 of 1260 matches
Mail list logo
