On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I could not resist the temptation to try another algorithm. I committed an
alternative using a topological sorting algorithm extracted from
Hi,
Our testers are currently running against Sun's CTS tests and the
relative ordering algorithm in
FacesConfigurator.sortRelativeOrderingList() is failing on a rather
simple case:
A after B
B before C
C before A
The expected faces-config ordering is B-C-A, but instead
Hi
I did the algorithm proposed there. For me it is ok if we can find a simpler
one, as long as all tests proposed pass.
Anyway, I'll check why it is failing.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/4 Curtiss Howard curtiss.how...@gmail.com
Hi,
Our testers are currently running against Sun's CTS
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I did the algorithm proposed there. For me it is ok if we can find a simpler
one, as long as all tests proposed pass.
Anyway, I'll check why it is failing.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
Thanks Leonardo. If you're
Hi
The algorithm proposed fails because it is not able to process the nodes in
the correct order (the algorithm assign a weight equal to all nodes, so it
fails when try to order them in a psedo postorder form). I don't see a
quick solution for that one, so I think is better and faster try another
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The algorithm proposed fails because it is not able to process the nodes in
the correct order (the algorithm assign a weight equal to all nodes, so it
fails when try to order them in a psedo postorder form). I don't
Hi
I could not resist the temptation to try another algorithm. I committed an
alternative using a topological sorting algorithm extracted from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/excalibur/trunk/fortress/container-api/src/java/org/apache/avalon/fortress/util/dag/
Since this one is in apache
