Hi,
I'd like to move the XhtmlConstants class to the API.
The only dependency on another IMPL class is very simple.
It is a constant, that resolves to a String ("portlet").
If nobody disagrees, I will move on with the move.
Yeah, just on trunk (Trinidad 1.2.x)
Thx,
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessend
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/15/2009 5:48 PM PT:
Hi,
I'd like to move the XhtmlConstants class to the API.
The only dependency on another IMPL class is very simple.
It is a constant, that resolves to a String ("portlet").
If nobody disagrees, I will move on with the move.
Yeah,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Blake Sullivan
wrote:
> Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/15/2009 5:48 PM PT:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to move the XhtmlConstants class to the API.
>> The only dependency on another IMPL class is very simple.
>> It is a constant, that resolves to a Strin
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/16/2009 11:12 AM PT:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Blake Sullivan
wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/15/2009 5:48 PM PT:
Hi,
I'd like to move the XhtmlConstants class to the API.
The only dependenc
Maybe we should also rename the "old" XhtmlConstants class ?
Would make sense, as all the (x)html stuff is about to be moved to API.
Since this class is containing misc things, like HTML (gone), events, params
and other rendering stuff (e.g. the * for the inputText
(secret:true)), we could
be
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On Oct 18, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Maybe we should also rename the "old" XhtmlConstants class ?
Would make sense, as all the (x)html stuff is about to be moved to
API.
Since this class is containing misc things, like HTML (gone),
events, params
Why is this being done again?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:32 PM, Blake Sullivan
wrote:
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On Oct 18, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Maybe we should also rename the "old" XhtmlConstants class ?
Would make sense, as all the (x)html stuff is
Hi all,
Personally, I would prefer to see that class divided in more specialized
classes like :
XhtmlElements
{
public static final String DIV = "div"; (or could be DIVISION)
public static final String TABLE = "table";
public static final String TABLE_BODY = "tbody";
public stati
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Simon Lessard
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Personally, I would prefer to see that class divided in more specialized
> classes like :
>
> XhtmlElements
> {
> public static final String DIV = "div"; (or could be DIVISION)
> public static final String TABLE = "table";
