Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

2009-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok... they moved the BUG to be SPEC specific, which means (to my understanding) that this won't be solved in the near future. See the spec ticket here: https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=662 as there was no veto on using trinidad, I committed it to the

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

2009-11-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, like faces-config name org_apache_myfaces_trinidad /name ... /faces-config doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a simplified version ? faces-config name trinidad /name ... /faces-config

[Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

2009-10-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, for adding support for 11.4.7, I am proposing we introduce a unique ID/NAME for the Apache MyFaces Trinidad library I think that we want something like this (to be added to the faces-config-base.xml): faces-config name org.apache.myfaces.trinidad /name ... /faces-config Not sure

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

2009-10-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1603 On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi, for adding support for 11.4.7, I am proposing we introduce a unique ID/NAME for the Apache MyFaces Trinidad library I think that we want something like this

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

2009-10-20 Thread Andy Schwartz
Hey Matthias - I like org.apache.myfaces.trinidad. Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks have done. I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will pass along any responses. Andy