, 10/1/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [core] FacesEL vs. UEL vs. UEL 2.2
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, October 1, 2010, 1:54 AM
Hi
2010/9/30 Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com
Hi
Agreed. I usually don't like numbers in method names, but in this case it's
more correct.
/JK
On 30 sep. 2010, at 23:04, Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
there is a disorder in Expression Lauguage names in myfaces core.
Currently myfaces (method
Yeah, saw this in the logs and wondered, 'caus EL was working well. Good to
know this in case a customer asks :-).
+1 for all your suggestions.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Am 30.09.2010 23:04, schrieb Martin Koci:
Hi,
there is a disorder in Expression Lauguage names in myfaces core.
Currently
Hi,
there is a disorder in Expression Lauguage names in myfaces core.
Currently myfaces (method
javax.faces.validator._ExternalSpecifications.isUnifiedELAvailable() for
example) output a log:
MyFaces Unified EL support enabled
But this is a little misleading: there should be Unified EL 2.2
Hi
2010/9/30 Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com
Hi,
there is a disorder in Expression Lauguage names in myfaces core.
Currently myfaces (method
javax.faces.validator._ExternalSpecifications.isUnifiedELAvailable() for
example) output a log:
MyFaces Unified EL support enabled
But
