On 4/2/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First - it's just a convenience, so you could remove it if you wanted,
with the possible disadvantages that Mike mentioned.
Second - the files were originally included, I removed them after
licensing issues were mentioned - then there was a
Maybe someone who is subscribed to legal-discuss (I'm not) can post
the issue over there and see if there's any consensus, then report the
results back here?
On 4/3/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First - it's just a
On Apr 2, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Martin Marinschek wrote:
First - it's just a convenience, so you could remove it if you wanted,
with the possible disadvantages that Mike mentioned.
Second - the files were originally included, I removed them after
licensing issues were mentioned - then there was a
I am disturbed by the web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd and web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd
files included in myfaces-impl-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar. The prolog in both files
says
!--
Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
--
I'm willing
Over in geronimo we noticed this text and have responded by:
1. for the schemas that we generate code from (using xmlbeans or
jaxb) we checked the schemas into a non-publically-accessible
repository (with our tck stuff) and generate the code there, and
publish source and binary jars, both
For this particular file set, the person to answer would be Martin
Marinschek as he committed the license and the files.
On 4/2/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lance,
I think you can safely delete these files without impacting your
application (although your app may go out to
One other thing to note is that the sun 1.1 dtd file is included
verbatim as part of the JSF spec.
See 10.3.3 Application Configuration Resource Format
On 4/2/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this particular file set, the person to answer would be Martin
Marinschek as he
Lance,
I think you can safely delete these files without impacting your
application (although your app may go out to the internet and attempt
to resolve the dtd reference if the files are not available locally).
I do see a license file located in the following location which does
appear to
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:38 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Over in geronimo we noticed this text and have responded by:
1. for the schemas that we generate code from (using xmlbeans or
jaxb) we checked the schemas into a non-publically-accessible
repository (with our tck stuff) and generate the code
I have tools that will create a DTD for a specific xml file.
Perhaps someone can provide a comprehensive faces-config file matching
the DTD and I can just parse the DTD from that file?
Seems like that'd be easier (or at least give a better starting point)
than going from scratch.
On 4/2/07,
First - it's just a convenience, so you could remove it if you wanted,
with the possible disadvantages that Mike mentioned.
Second - the files were originally included, I removed them after
licensing issues were mentioned - then there was a lengthy discussion
(which I don't remember anymore),
11 matches
Mail list logo
