Re: Classloaders and component boundaries

2011-01-11 Thread David Jencks
Hi, It's a month later, holidays are over, I'd like to ask again that this be considered. thanks david jencks On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi I don't think we can include it for 2.0.3 release. This change should be discussed carefully, and that requires some time to

Re: Classloaders and component boundaries

2011-01-11 Thread David Jencks
and component boundaries To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 12:44 AM In geronimo we've been studying the ee platform spec section 8.3 and think that it's allowable to have a single classloader per ear, and we're currently implementing

Re: Classloaders and component boundaries

2010-12-07 Thread Mark Struberg
remember the spec... So imo this sounds like a no-go LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 12/7/10, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com Subject: Classloaders and component boundaries To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org Date: Tuesday

Classloaders and component boundaries

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks
In geronimo we've been studying the ee platform spec section 8.3 and think that it's allowable to have a single classloader per ear, and we're currently implementing this (in geronimo 3). However the jsf spec requires that different web apps in an ear be distinguishable in the

Re: Classloaders and component boundaries

2010-12-06 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi I don't think we can include it for 2.0.3 release. This change should be discussed carefully, and that requires some time to analyze and identify the implications if this patch is included. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/12/6 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com In geronimo we've been