Grrr... first I posted directly to James, then to the MAVEN dev list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 15, 2006 10:32 AM
Subject: Tomahawk Documentation --> (Was ADF Faces)
To: MyFaces Development
Sorry. Meant to post this to
Sorry. Meant to post this to the list.
Sean
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 15, 2006 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: ADF Faces
To: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
James,
Thanks for the offer. JIRA tickets sound good. The APT format sounds
gre
On 2/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a few other ideas about the revised docs. I'm not sure syntax
> and usage are that helpful. We now have a pretty good subsistute for
> syntax in the form of the TLD docs. Maybe we could have a "See TLD
> Documentation" under the synt
> I disagree with the removal of the usage section. The usage section
> shows how to use the component in context which is not always obvious.
> I don't see a problem with making it optional for trivial components,
> however.
Yes well some usage sections are better then others. I took a look
ag
ebruary 15, 2006 10:33 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Tomahawk Documentation --> (Was ADF Faces)
Sorry. Meant to post this to the list.
Sean
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 15, 2006 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: ADF Faces
To: James
On 2/16/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Sean. From reading everyone else's feedback too, I'm
> thinking it's best to just convert what already exists in xdoc format to APT
> format initially. Once that's done, we can address what the desired content
> of the pa
FWIW, one of the tools that will be coming from the ADF Faces side
of things is a Maven 2 report that goes from our metadata to
tagdocs that are a big improvement over the tlddoc generated
docs. Tlddoc is pretty awful for JSF - every type is String,
nothing is "request time", there's no list of fa
That is great Adam,
Is the source of the docs in the link below a standard tld file? if
so that is great!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
On Feb 16, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Adam Winer wrote:
FWIW, one of the tools that will be coming from the AD
It's not a TLD file, since TLDs simply don't have any
of this information. Instead, it's a faces-config file.
Our approach is that TLDs and JSP tags in general
are secondary artifacts; faces-config is the primary
artifact.
-- Adam
On 2/16/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is
Hi Adam,
that stuff looks really great!
-Matthias
On 2/16/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not a TLD file, since TLDs simply don't have any
> of this information. Instead, it's a faces-config file.
>
> Our approach is that TLDs and JSP tags in general
> are secondary artifacts;
I wonder if we could use annotations to help with the documentation
generation? I'm not that famliar with annotations though so maybe I
am way off here.
Sean
On 2/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> that stuff looks really great!
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 2/16/06, Ada
James has already started to open tickets
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1124
> > I guess for now I will open JIRA tickets with files attached. Let me know if
> > you want me to submit the APT files a different way.
Since he is Struts PMC and he knows and understands the ASF thing
We need to take a PMC vote on that. Existing ASF committers of course
can be fast-tracked so I imagine that vote will come soon ;-). For
now James has agreed to let us apply his patches for him.
If you're going to apply a patch. Be sure to mark the JIRA issue as
'In progress' so we don't all ap
13 matches
Mail list logo
